You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is shadow banning a thing on steemit?
Evidence? You're already convinced that someone is out to get ya, and so it doesn't matter what I presume but what you do. You call a broken page evidence of what exactly?
The link not loading.
It's the content not loading that raises my hackles.
Yeah and you tried to dwindle down the probable cause before you went about putting Scooby-Doo narratives together?
It is no big reveal that stinc is shady.
Yeah, repeat the same bullshit enough that it stops being bullshit.
Lol, it only needs the seeds of truth.
When stinc does something deserving of a change in reputation, they will get it.
O yeah, I'm sure there's a nugget of truth somewhere in that shitpile you serve regularly about steemit and I'm not only being sarcastic as all hell.
/sarcasmball
Tell me again why you slander steemit, tell me again why did you write that Garbage slanderous idiocy about steemit being for censorship or having an agenda? What nuggets of truth did you squeeze that out of?
The nugget of truth is that until I served this 'steeming shitpost' my link wouldn't load for over a week, and an undetermined number of months before that.
The post consisted of negative content about how the whales were sucking up all the pool.
Had the post been about how I love sucking the golden balls of an all powerful god I might not have alluded to the same connotations.
As it is now, I have to regularly check to see if my links are again broken.
I'm not breaking the links, you are not breaking the links, that doesn't leave too many suspects, does it?
There is no question that stinc has a long history of favoring only favorable speech, quick as they break my link again I will let you know.
My question now is, why do you care?
The nugget of truth is pure unadulterated circumstantial supposition, nothing more. You neither narrowed down anything regarding it or offered anything to validate the incessant slander you publish regularly regarding steemit. There is no question? Really? Obviously you took the line about repeating bullshit as a way of operating not as ridicule of your imbecilic slanderous nonsense, because to you, it's already settled m, regardless that you have absolutely fucking nothing to substantiate your claims with. "a long history".. What a load of pure bullshit.
Why do you care what I care about? I don't think you care, I think you've been thoroughly exposed, exposed as a spreader of bullshit, exposed as a peddler of slanderous accusations without any proof to support them, you've been exposed as a hopeless loon seeking to push Scooby-Doo narratives about the development behind the most popular censorship resistant social media network that have absolutely no merit, and instead of offering proof, of substantiating your slanderous nonsense, you try to make this about my motivation, about my interests, but it wasn't ever about me, and it's a fat chance of me being the topic, as far as I'm concerned it doesn't matter why I'm pointing out the idiocy and insipid nonsense, all that matters is the proof of your bullshit, let's see this mythical nugget of truth that you think requires all this slanderous bullshit to flourish in.