@talltim @primal-buddhist @bitcoinsig

referring to the whitepaper and social network value

Multi spam accounts bring zero "Social" Network value

spam accounts perform no discussion so real engagement

spam accounts spread generic posts to get comment rewards cluttering up well written articles and lessening value

referring to comments on reposting links see youtubes standard license fair use explanation

No. 3 The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the “heart” of the work.

speaks for itself

1. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

Uses that harm the copyright owner’s ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies.

reposting would harm the profits of creators because they've already used the product and paidthe poster hence losing that "sale".