You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Targeted again by more losers. Please flag into oblivion.
It is not acceptable to call other people on Steemit, "the most gullible of retards."
Debate with me all you like, fine.
Nobody has to agree with me or like me.
We should all stay civil though,
something that i-repost has not done.
What is really funny is that this poor guy thinks we are "mad." I find the dishonest means of making money through exploiting people's compassion unpalatable. The free market of Steem is speaking.
@Kafkanarchy84, capitalism should not tell people how they can or cannot make money. That is freedom. When you start to try to dictate the rules, the morality, through subjectivity or maybe objectivity, you begin to regulate maybe too much and you begin to centralize the process of determining who can money and how they can make money.......... but it becomes your system..... you become the king or the God of the world when you start to tell people that they are breaking the rules of the supply and demand for economics, for capitalism.......
.
While you tell some people that they cannot make money this way or that way or another way, you are therefore emphasizing that this one issue or person or whatever is a bigger problem then how the Democrats and CNN and many people have been given financial support from terrorists......
.
So, you are saying this is so much worse than terrorism.......... and you are saying this either directly or indirectly regardless of whether it is or is not your intent... regardless of whether you know it or not..... you are asking for bigger government..........
.
Steemit and Bitcoin is against that kind of regulation that you call for.............
When did I tell anyone how to make money? This is a stake-weighted voting platform. Do you get that? That means stake holders can use their votes (up or down) as they please. What exactly is your angle here?
I never told anyone how they can or cannot make money. You sound ridiculous.
I flagged him btw..
Gonna hijack upper post this to bring attention to something a bit interesting.
Currently, this post has 90 upvotes. While my post has a total of 12 votes. Why aren't all the people upvoting this post coming to downvote my post?
Few possibilities might be
A) They see it's already low enough and don't bother
B) They auto-upvoted this post and aren't even online
C) They upvoted for some of that sweet sweet creation reward and actually didn't even read the post.
If C is even the least bit true, then that would indicate major problems with steemit.
One more thing...
Right now this post is worth $120 and will give kafka a nice little payout, but is it really worth that?
There are hundreds of other actually somewhat interesting posts that aren't valued anywhere near as much despite being of actual substance and not lazy low quality drama.
Currently, the community is saying that a post about some retard telling people that some other retard made a shitpost is more valuable than the art, recipes and the majority of other posts on this website.
Once again, I would like to thank kafka for bringing attention to my posting for I believe it helps to point out some of the flaws with steemit that will hopefully be corrected when more knowledgeable and level-headed witnesses take over.
Maybe you are retarded and don't realise that upvotes and downvotes burn VP the same way. I think this post has enough visibility, I follow this user, have done for a long time, and you, sir, are a moron. Now, I have another two flags to apply with my other account.
Well obviously they do, but there shouldn't be a difference of 80 votes.
And good on you for having multiple accounts, as you could tell from the post but I'm a huge supporter of multi-accounting. It's really profitable.
I have @elfspice, because I owned that name back in 2002, on DMT world and The Hive. You might not even be old enough to remember these sites.
I discovered about 6 months ago that some asshole had taken the name @elfspice and was poncing around pretending to be me.
How would you feel about that? Do you think you would have grabbed the account name on Steem if some asshole had been ruining your reputation in the rest of thte interwebs?
It was worth a try, at least.
Just go seach the hive archives you find here and there. Go read some @elfspice posts. See if you don't recognise my writing and my obsessions.
I remember hearing about them, never bothered with them though because the arcade machines said that winners don't use drugs.
I mean, that really just depends whether or not you really care what others think about your screen name and its "reputation." I guess it also depends on if you identify with your screen name or believe yourself to have some claim to ownership over it.
Personally, I don't believe that online reputation matters in the slightest or that an account name is any actual signifier of who a person is.
@canadian-coconut I was horrified to see this treatment of you! Your response says all that needs to be said. Jealous trolls will be jealous trolls.
It is the same troll that trolled my post, and that is unacceptable behavior to call people names. It is not the way to succeed on this site.
yeah thats pretty jacked up...theres people with down syndrome legitly suffering and this guy takes no regard of the meaning of "the most gullible retards".
I don't mind being called a "retard," per se, but this poor fellow doesn't understand that there are real market consequences for such actions.
It's both. He wants other steemians to scam the most 'gullible retards' out of their votes by lying to them them and taking advantage of their caring nature.
You know, I actually care about people who are autistic. That's one reason that I speak out like I do. But this man has no problem mocking autistics. He's following @baah around, calling himself @baahs-caretaker, and commenting that people should go easy on baah because he is autistic and is his special boy.
@canadian-coconut yeah thats pretty mean, I have a friend named nick who is autistic as well, and is very intelligent and is a great person, but what is sad is people like him just make fun of him
Yeah, I don't like that, either.
yeah...they really shouldnt be on steemit
@canadian-coconut, I think people should debate with you more. Sadly, some people are flagging instead of debating. That is what the left does. That is what Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders and Obama and CNN and people on the left encourages people to do. People should look at the history of the vaccines. Look at the mercury. Look at the affect vaccines has. Look at the people who are told be revaccinated again and again. Look at the affect it has on their children. I was not vaccinated. They told my mom to vaccinate me. What happened to me? Am I dead now because I was vaccinated? Am I worse off now?
I'm glad to debate anyone at any time.
@kafkanarchy84, a flag is not a debate. You are living in a paradox. You are a Democrat. You say one thing but you do a different thing all together.
Wrong. Boycotting a store or merchant is not a vote in the same way that voting for a political candidate is. I am expressing a market preference for not being scammed by jealous losers that don't want to treat their fellow humans as such. How am I a democrat for pointing out the fly in the soup?
Have fun with your religion. You are doing the same thing he or she is doing. You are telling people what to do. They are telling people what to do too. But you think you are better because you believe you are right and the others are wrong. But those people think you are wrong. You are not tolerant and you do not care that others disagree with you.
.
You say you care and you say you are opened to debate but then you downvote and stuff which does the opposite of debate. You discourage people from debating with you when you flag them. The flag is like a punch in the face. You tell people to debate but then when they say something you do not like, then like the left, like the mafia, you punch them in the face through the system of flagging.
"Punch in the face?" Have you read the white paper. Do you understand the platform??? Get outta here.
I believe in the freedom of speech. Kathy Griffin held the head of a USA President. In NYC, they murdered the president every night in a play. Snoop Dog shot the President. I described an action that you did. And you said that I did what you did. I was telling you what you did when you flagged people. I described an analogy. I described an illustration. You told me to get out of here. You are telling people what to do like a bully. You act like a bully like the left. People say that people can do all of these things and say many things. I said something that was meant to describe the situation. You take what I said out of context. That is too bad for you.
So...in essence, you are free to say what you like, but not me, because when I do it, I'm a bully.
Inane.
We have both debated nicely with LOTS of people.
Most people stay civil even when we disagree.
Did you read the post by i-repost?
I'm confused why you think flagging that would be innappropriate.
We don't flag people who want to debate.
I flagged someone once who called me a "satanist." noganoo put my name in the title of his rant and his first tag was "satanist".
That is an appropriate flag.
And so is flagging someone who calls you a retard in his post and tells people to scam you by lying to you and pretending to have an injured child.
Whaaaaaaat?!!!!!
Sadly it's true.
I will not flag people no matter what they call me. Because once you go down that path of flagging, it takes you down the path of the dark side. It becomes maybe too subjective. Especially because I do not want to flag people for something that I might do myself. But regardless of whether I do or wrong or a right thing, some people think they can determine whether what I did was right or wrong through their subjective emotions that are blind to objective reality.
.
You have the freedom to flag for any reason on Steemit maybe. I mean, there are different reasons why people flag other people.
.
But I am not going to say that flagging is or is not a good or bad thing. I think it is not that simple to describe and everything....
.
If you are emotionally affected by an insult, then you can seek revenge or justice or whatever you want to call it regardless of what it may or may not really or actually be.........
.
I did not flag people on Steemit yet......
.
You can flag people whenever you want........
.
But this is a very subjective practice........ because an insult is not always a bad thing..... sometimes, people say things to help you see the truth...... an insult is not always an insult...... but we can become too emotional and affected in a too personal way that blinds us from eternal perspective..........
Let he or she who is without sin cast the first stone or flag......... let the perfect person flag the not perfect people........... I am not perfect and I am bias and I make mistakes and I do wrong things...... I want to reward people for doing good.....
?????
This is a stake-weighted voting platform man. Not a church.
You are so racist.
lol