there is a definite knowledge

We all know that one of the main and most valued goals is knowledge. It is no wonder the famous phrase by Francis Bacon, "knowledge is power," is widely recognized. Many would likely agree with this sentiment, while some might not. Let's consider the phrase in its practical application: through our understanding of various aspects of life and creation, we have made significant advancements. For example, we learned about atoms, which eventually led to the concept of a nuclear bomb (though I still don't understand why we haven't harnessed nuclear energy for better uses). Another example is Leonardo da Vinci, who, through studying the anatomy of living beings, developed practices later used in medicine and other fields. Some knowledge is more theoretical, requiring deeper comprehension and understanding. I believe that every understanding is practical depending on how one intends to use it, particularly in its respective area.

Now, arriving at the more interesting point: how flexible is knowledge for practical use? It seems that humans have an inherent drive to seek and gather truth. But what is done with the acquired knowledge often becomes a significant and unpredictable matter leading to conclusive results. I greatly admire Nikola Tesla for transforming knowledge into ideas and subsequently materializing them, though not so much for his way of life. One could say his dream was very socialist or overly idealistic to expect such outcomes. Regardless, the result was that no one supported his idea. However, only geniuses have developed the capability to achieve such things. I’m not saying that only those people have done it; in a certain way, everyone uses their knowledge. A cook uses what they know about cooking to create in new ways, just as in other professions. Must knowledge be thoroughly understood to be applied? For example, a book on how a car works and how to assemble it will give a perspective on the process and understanding. Meanwhile, a mechanic already knows all of this and is practically bound to that knowledge, essentially a database meant to be utilized more effectively. However, the problem with theoretical knowledge is that it becomes less useful for many if not properly applied. I would argue that if simple knowledge is learned and then expanded upon, it generates new knowledge through the development of ideas.

-I would like to know if you agree or if you have any comments, feel free to vote or share your thoughts.