By coincidence the seduction theory was wholly consistent with the ancient religious condemnation of any sexual experience outside monogamous marriage<<<
dude. They allowed marriage at 12. Isn't that friggin' young enough? Or is your attitude: "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed"? Jeeze, old man. Go get some A.I. sex dolls that look younger. You are making it IMPOSSIBLE to sell the AnarchoVoluntaryist message. LITERALLY impossible.
Sorry, but your comment is difficult to understand. My post is about a scientific study that was censored for political reasons. Are you defending or excusing that censorship? My reference to ancient religious beliefs which informed primitive medicine as well as archaic legal scholarship was intended to promote free thought based on empirical evidence and justice not affiliated with some church doctrine that advocates mutilating children. Trying to "sell" the AnarchoVoluntaryist message is not my priority here.
Censorship is never to be tolerated. And I realize you aren't trying to sell the A/V platform, but your postings bring forth something they need to deal with.
Who is "they"? And by "deal with" do you mean respond to a post with personal attacks? Note that this post is not about me, and depsite your two comments you haven't addressed what my post specifically says. That's doesn't sound like you have much sympathy for scientific researchers who are censored for political reasons.
ugh. We are not making progess... just cross talking. The "they" in my sentence refers to those promoting AnarchoCapitalismVoluntaryism. And no one is censoring any damned "scientific research"... especially here in Blockchain based Steemit. So "sympathy" isn't even in a conversation, contextually. And you are right. I haven't addressed that which you are claiming. I have been focusing on the political fall out from Anarchos lack of desire to bring the convo to front and center while they still have a chance to control the public narrative on the subject matter.
We disagree on a lot of things and have argued back and forth before, but I couldn't agree more about your stance on this. Voluntaryism is all about voluntary interaction between adults. Anyone trying to normalize sexual interaction between adults and children is a predator that needs to be destroyed.
You are jumping to conclusions. There is nothing in what I wrote that is "trying to normalize sexual interaction between adults and children." In the midst of an international witch hunt over nudity and sex, your accusation is irresponsible. I expect an apology.
LOL You expect an apology? That's funny. I'm the one investigating your content. What you're up to and what you believe is still unknown too.
No, there's no centralized censorship here, but there is community censorship. If someone is promoting something contrary to good ethics and good morals, something that is not voluntary and between consenting adults, they will be squashed.
How does the "squashing" take place? In any case, the issue I am bringing to light, which it seems Mr. finnian is comprehending, is how the Anarcho folks intend to capture and punish such pedophilia without cops and courts enforcing any "law". Show me, don't tell me. 47 years of talk on the subject is enough. We need to SEE the community handle it in practice.