Science and religion are two independent domains that can live together as long as they maintain a 'safe distance' with each other. There should be no conflict because science and religion are in different domains.

Statements of science and religious statements also have an irreconcilable language because each statement serves a different function in human life and tries to answer different problems.

Dialogue is the third approach. Dialogue attempts are made by comparing the methods of these two fields, which can show similarities and differences. For example, conceptual models and analogies can be used to describe things that can not be directly observed, such as God or subatomic particles. Scientists and clerics are dialogue partners in doing critical reflection on science and religion topics while respecting each other's integrity.

The fourth approach is integration. Some scientists and scholars seek to find common ground between science and religion. In natural theology, for example, it has been known about the scientific evidence of the existence of God. Astronomers, for example, argue that the physical constant in the universe seems to be designed so carefully. If the rate of expansion of the universe a second after the Big Bang is a little smaller (than is now known), the universe will collapse before the chemical elements necessary for life are formed.

Barbour's model of science and religion relations is not the only approach. Some other names propose a slightly different approach with more complicated models. It can be said that Barbour's model allows us to understand possible relationships between science and religion. Although he focuses on the Christian tradition, Barbour believes that the examples of the four categories of relationships can be found in other great religious traditions.

Thank you, your post is always interesting to read, because a lot of science in it.