RE: Understanding Cognition: The Moon Hoax Bias
I think this post raises a much bigger question than just the moon landings.
The question being: Why do people choose to trust in the official narrative?
The list of lies from 'the establishment' go on forever and ever.
Why would people to choose an institution that is proven to be pathological liars? Time after time after time.
What makes this time different than the other million lies?
Only with the appearance of the internet, people for the first time in history, have the opportunity to examine the official narrative.
Recent events like 9/11, highlight the obvious cover up's, and so things are then examined in this context.
If it comes from an official narrative, I am automatically cynical.
Why?
Because history tells me that they are liars, and I never trust liars to tell me the truth.
But that's just me.
Moon landings, flat earth, 9/11 = confirmation bias.
As I mention in the post, there are many, many, many 3rd party and independent debunks of the moon hoax and for that matter 9/11. However confirmation bias will not allow you to accept any of those. Preferring instead to believe that the official narrative is a single source story that is attempting to fool everyone.
Cg
One second...are you saying that you accept the 9/11 official narrative?..
I'm confused...
So watch the Mythbusters clip that @old-guy-photos posts at the top of the comment section. Are they part of the official narrative?
Is everyone in that clip somehow in on this incredibly complex hoax? Or is the Occam's Razor at work here, and we simply went to the moon?
Cg