RE: Understanding Cognition: The Moon Hoax Bias
The Russian space agency whom had their own space program and were bitter rivals to NASA. Monitored the entire flight and would be the first to cry foul if they hadn't really gone.
I doubt this very much. The idea that the "Russian Govern-cement was our enemy" was a story. There is too much evidence of collusion between the two space programs. And if you look broader, you see that an enemy is what the media has always been painting. To the kings, its a game, to the pawns its a war.
The lunar landing was filmed on a set. It was filmed on earth. Study of the images, how they were made, how they were distributed leaves no doubt about that. Things like "the coke bottle" seen in one of those images puts paid to it all being a hoax.
Now, did we actually go to the moon? Maybe. There is actually quite a lot of evidence that they did go to the moon. And Richard Hoagland analyzes many of the pictures and gives some very good reasons why we never saw, or were told of what was there.
Further, we have operating space flying saucers. They are able to be seen by any who wants to look.
So, we have lies, on top of lies, on top of lies.
It is quite easy to see why many would just put the whole thing in the hoax category.
You are suffering from confirmation bias, every single thing you have said in this reply has been reliably debunked by 3rd parties. Just click on the second link at the bottom of the post and you will see that.
However I'm pretty sure you won't, or if you do you will dismiss the overwhelming evidence, this is due to another bias. Of which I will write about later in the series, probably next :-)
Cg
So watch the Mythbusters clip that @old-guy-photos posts at the top of the comment section. Are they part of the official narrative?
Is everyone in that clip somehow in on this incredibly complex hoax? Or is the Occam's Razor at work here, and we simply went to the moon?
Cg
The problem with your logic is that there are documented conspiracies involving hundreds of people... who never talked.
So, Occam's razor not only fails in this instance, but doesn't even apply.
Please educate me and name one.
Cg
Sorry, i do not remember names. But they were easy to find on the interwebs. There was a big one that was busted in Italy, or some country near it that sounds similar.
Further, you may be interested in what a 33rd degree Mason is.
Basically they have been told 32 different conspiracy theories. One at each level. 32 different stories about the same thing. The first ones are just tests to see if you are the talking type.
And, what is really interesting is that everything isn't really a secret, it is hidden in plain sight.
It is all there for you to read if you know how to read.
So, the Masons is one conspiracy involving hundreds of people.
Lol.
Cg
Double lol. :-)
Cg
It really is a serious problem.
I take all the information in and never forget it.
But the names of people, i do not remember.
I even have problems remembering the names of my friends.
It makes talking about conspiracy theories and the like almost impossible.
It made taking tests about history very hard.
Since i stated something that would be considered a third option, then it is hard to jump to "confirmation bias" as a causal attribute. So, what are you referring to?
I have reviewed all of the evidence that i could find. And these are my findings from those.
I am sure that if you reviewed all the evidence that you would come to the same conclusion.
But, maybe not. I have an engineering type mind, and so i am very aware of what is mechanically doable and what is not. And thus, things that are obvious to me (as obvious as things fall toward the earth) may not be obvious to you.