Sort:  

Do you have any links, mate? (no gnostic/irvin of course)

...you mean 'no' , then?

Why did you dismiss it as "semantics on language"?

So that's a ....
' No, I don't have any more information from other sources, to substantiate the claim,' then?

Evading the consequences of marginalizing a source, so much for seeking to understand.

So I take it that means that there is no other source...?

Unfortunately there's no way for you to defend your hero at this time, check mate.