When will it be so far if we called it is a prank?

Recently, the famous brand D&G broke the incident of insulting China. Through chopsticks to eat pizza or spaghetti, although I don’t know what the intention of the film is, the whole feeling is to make fun of our food culture and customs, just like telling you to wave to people. A ignorant act is the same. However, this is not his first time. It should have similar experience in the eyes of Hong Kong people, such as not letting local people take pictures. In fact, you don't want people to take pictures, you can not open a branch in Hong Kong.

The other is the foreign net red RiceGum, commonly known as rice gelatin (which is a relatively vulgar word in Guangdong) came to Hong Kong to ask if there is any dog to eat, to make fun of our English ability and to let the elderly on the street eat food that he has not eaten yet. . In fact, what is the purpose of this film? You go to a place where English is not a native language to speak English, and then you have to make fun of other people's language, but the road sign is English. So can we speak Cantonese or Chinese in your place, and then make fun of your Chinese skills?

The film finally inspired us to do the same thing, it is a prank, and now it seems to be a gold medal for death. As long as we are a prank, it is not a crime. If you are angry, or complain about us, it proves that you can't afford it. Is this correct? You play with the pain of others, and you are correct, I am making mistakes?

However, the publishers of these films, the pranksters, will not be legally liable or forced to stop making, they will continue to create, why? In the final analysis, there are some people who support them. Rice gelatin is supported by supporters in the United States. The famous brand is supported by foreigners. There is a British mischievous net red that constantly confuses his younger brother for three years. Now he continues and is very rich. Why, because you and I continue to support Let's go.

Although we have always said whether it will be too hot, it should be banned, but we have been watching, spending, and becoming their supporters.

However, we all understand that it is not a very feasible thing to completely ban mischief or legislation, or something that will not be realized so quickly, but we all at least recognize some bottom lines, and we can’t really do it. After all, we see mischief. It is not human reflection, but happiness.

So there should be two bottom lines or guidelines:

First, the bottom line of the law. These pranks or social experiments are responsible for the law, but because the laws of different places or countries are different, but at the very least not murder or the property or interests of others. No one will believe that you are holding a weapon to go to the bank to rob, and being caught by someone and then saying that it is a prank will be fine. Therefore, we must have at least legal and correct moral values.

The second is the object. The object mentioned is whether the object is voluntary or allowed. If they are doing a program, and one is being played, one is going to play, this is an entertainment program. But if that person is not satisfied, or even involuntary (of course, the film photographer must deal with the material, or even can not release), this is overdone.The fact that I want to bring out a prank this time does not mean a death-free gold medal. Freedom does not mean that you can kill, because this is abusing freedom. To put it plainly, it is selfishness, and more directly, it is inhuman. Therefore, as supporters or netizens, we don't have to be a keyboard man to change the world, let those net red review and remind them not to overdo it, or even report them. Because you have to understand, in fact, Net Red needs supporters, and supporters also need Net Red to shoot good movies, so we can't let go because of mischief.