Steemit on this issue is of the retarded mind that people want other people to have the option to decide for them what they can and can't see, and this is probably because they, like this idiot, think that comments under a post by anyone other than the posts author say something about the post itself, that they can devalue or infringe on the post but the matter of fact is that this is a public place, people are posting on a public place, and commenting on a public place, they aren't owed any kind of reservations, no one can own the place, only what they bring to it.
Lol, don't you know Stinc, et al, is steem royalty?
They decree how things are , and we like it.
Well, the morons that don't know better might like it, and maybe the cucks.
I don't like it, at all.
Not true, the EIP isn't their decree, nor was linear their decree, and if they really think they are royalty they need a lesson in history as a lot of dethroned kings and queens caution against abusing their position, along with many more exiled or executed.
You're conveniently leaving out the precursor to the announcement, which was by and large the numerous stakeholders diligently addressing the issue of bidbots/content indifferent voting and putting forth the idea by debate and discussion alike in other people's minds so that it finally couldn't be ignored or dismissed.
Yes.
It wasn't this one so much as it was the last one.
The thirty some months it took to give in to what had been on the table all along is what upsets me.
Steemit on this issue is of the retarded mind that people want other people to have the option to decide for them what they can and can't see, and this is probably because they, like this idiot, think that comments under a post by anyone other than the posts author say something about the post itself, that they can devalue or infringe on the post but the matter of fact is that this is a public place, people are posting on a public place, and commenting on a public place, they aren't owed any kind of reservations, no one can own the place, only what they bring to it.
Lol, don't you know Stinc, et al, is steem royalty?
They decree how things are , and we like it.
Well, the morons that don't know better might like it, and maybe the cucks.
I don't like it, at all.
Not true, the EIP isn't their decree, nor was linear their decree, and if they really think they are royalty they need a lesson in history as a lot of dethroned kings and queens caution against abusing their position, along with many more exiled or executed.
It was announced and then witnesses were asked to support it.
We know the witnesses positions are contingent on keeping some of the et al happy.
You're conveniently leaving out the precursor to the announcement, which was by and large the numerous stakeholders diligently addressing the issue of bidbots/content indifferent voting and putting forth the idea by debate and discussion alike in other people's minds so that it finally couldn't be ignored or dismissed.
Yes.
It wasn't this one so much as it was the last one.
The thirty some months it took to give in to what had been on the table all along is what upsets me.