Direct democracy with respect for the people, carried out successfully by the people.

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED
to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

AND FOR THESE ENDS
to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors, and to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS. Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.

Looking through my almost 50 years of life, I have to conclude that, although the starting point is beautiful, the UN have never been busy to preserve the safety of peoples.
It may be due to my definition of war, but emotional-psychological war is also war. And is not that what we are being bombarded with?
War threats are being measured in the media.
Devastating practices to overthrow governments are commonplace.
Not to mention the false flag attacks that plague so many countries in Europe as well as many psyops that are going on and on.
Trump's chair had not yet been warmed up by his ass or he ordered the U.S. Military to treat Syria to a bomb shower. Again under false pretences.
His predecessor was not much more peaceful and decided to bomb a peace-loving country, where the people lived under a socialistic direct democracy, to the ground.
The country where this charter was drown up and signed is the largest perpetrator of insecurity in the world.

No one has the right to invade someone else's land. No one.
Just like nobody has the right to enter someone's house without being invited.
Yet we see how the United States and NATO's allies time and again are interfering with other people's governmental structure and then throwing that people into a war.
Not openly, of course, very underhanded. And the media reports the noncence of the press agencies, while video footage and the heads of government of the invaded countries, report something completely different.
People like me are then put in the conspiracy theorem corner while the real plot is forged in the back rooms of political leaders.
In 2011 there were demonstrations in Syria because a number of things did not go very well in the formation of the democracy overthere. Yes, people just go to the streets in Syria to demonstrate, they do not have to first apply for a permit for the demonstration like here in the Netherlands. There was contact between the demonstration leaders and the government and they would have done well themselves.
What we heard here through the media and government was a completely different picture. President Assad, like Ghadaffi, would be a tyrant. They call it a brutal dictator in the media, which is actually a tyrant if you look it up the dictionary.
On video images you can see that a Westerner threw the first stone, not the people. From that moment on it quickly went downhill for the population. Terrorists, trained by the CIA, came to bring the oppression. The US, together with a number of Western countries including the Netherlands, financed the terrorists and the country has been in an unsafe place ever since.
And so it also happened to Libya. The country was a socialist direct democracy ensured that for more than 40 years people were provided with free education, medical assistance, water and electricity etc. Food had a symbolic price tag and tax was not levied in the country. Yet it was the richest country in Africa by oil extraction due to Western greedy people who "needed" more and more. The only reason this war was started is because Libya decided not to want to trade in the petrodollar anymore.

To mention all the wars here and to describe the actual reasons for the wars, I am of course not going to do. Search for that yourself.
I just want to mention here that the entire charter is based on lies and hypocrisy and doesn't even come close to equality netween peoples.
International politics is as corrupt as politics in many countries in the world.
And how could it be otherwise, it is an extension of the companies that control the national politics that influence global politics.
We, the peoples, let ourselfs be guided by criminals.
In our own country, that can be observed when the social sercurities are being broken down to the point that people get into trouble.
It can also be seen from the murder of Pim Fortuyn, which was indeed a political murder, but that is of course swept under the carpet. The scapegoat has been locked up for 12 years and is now running free again. And if you are well paid, and I suspect that this is the case, then yes 12 years and then you can live carefree. What people do for a few pennies.

If you look at the outcome of most socialist societies, you can criticize their actions. The idea is righteous.
I can not say anything about the accusations of Ghadaffi's wrong doing. It is simple, the media manipulate images and who knows, they also produce images, just like the White Helmets.
Less than 10 minutes in this video (

) (recommended) and having read his green book, I have to say that a person who has such idealistic thoughts, with a peace loving attitude and has been brought up with reverence and lived that way, almost certainly will not have committed wrongdoings against his own people of the sorts he's been accused of. The revolution in the 1960s was carried out almost without any bloodshed.
It can all be found on our beloved internet.
What I found is that Libya has actually implemented the IVRM and has done justice to the Libyan people.
And now look at the chaos in the country.
Consider this question: If our country is a direct democracy and every one is housed, free water, free electricity, free health care, free education and food prices are symbolic, who would rebel against the person who internationally represented his people? (Please note that everything you have heard about the man may be completely lied)

I am an idealist and I am passionate about expanding the awareness of my fellow man.
Since I have plenty of time to sort things out, I find out that really everything is being lied about, manipulated and staged. I write my blogs about this. Not always with the desired message, but always truthfully and from a righteous attitude to life.
I understand that my thoughts often recieved with pain, which is usually when the truth is proclaimed.
When my fellow human being realizes, finally realizes, how we are manipulated and conditioned from the beginning, then we can actually start looking at our own actions, and make choices based so all the peoples will prosper and trive.
Think of emotional and psychological prosperity and therefore physical well-being.
Under the direct democracy the health of the Libyans has greatly improved. Child mortality was the lowest of all African countries.
Looking quickly at the number of cancer cases in Libya and the Netherlands, people would actually be better off in a socialist direct democracy.
It is for these reasons that I keep returning to mentality and how an altered mentality (truthful and righteous) could lead to a socialist direct democracy and then flow to the Resource Based Economy (RBE).
And I can assure you that the UN will never choose to take Gaddafi's words to heart for all the reasons he states in his speech. Nor will the international community (UN) never come to the dissission of creating an RBE.
It will have to come from the peoples since the political leaders are led by businessmen and businessmen will never take your interests into consideration.

Let your thoughts go over the possibilities and how to come together to a society where everyone is provided in all basic needs and granted their rights.

Thank you for your attention

Peace, love and Understanding.