You've made a heap of assertions in direct opposition to the claims about white males advocating small government.
Where is your evidence?
Y'know - the information you use to verify your beliefs are in accordance with reality. Y'know, the thing that separates your bold assertions from fiction. Y'know, the data that proves you're not trying to spread lies and deceit. Evidence.
The dominant voting demographic when the major enabling legislation of the early-mid 20th century (Federal Reserve Act, Income Tax Amendment, Direct Election of Senators Amendment, New Deal-era Legislation/EOs, Great Society-era Legislation) for the Total State was enacted was WHITE, CHRISTIAN, SOCIALLY-CONSERVATIVE MEN.
Its one thing to SAY you want smaller govt...its a different thing to actually WANT it.
I have nothing against white people, but Stef is really full of shit to suggest that whites have, anytime w/i the last 100+ years, seriously voted for smaller govt. Trump is no small-govt. guy either, he's just another in a LONG line of FDR-clones to occupy the White House.
When, not "if", but WHEN ZioShill Trump pulls a Reagan & grants amnesty, I'm gonna have a field day here on Stef's blog...and libertarian turncoat Molyneux won't be able to ban me from this platform like he has on others...
But what is your evidence... You've only made assertions. Stef has data to back up his claims. His claims have evidence to go along with his assertions.
Your "evidence" seems to be: people voted and government got bigger. whites were a big demographic during these expansions and therefore whites want big government.
This is an interesting counter-point to be sure, but pretending what you've presented constitutes evidence to counter the thesis being presented kinda makes you the thick one.
The point is that white majorities have NO connection to smaller govt., contrary to what the "new & improved" Stefan (I was following him back in 2008 when he said supporting Ron Paul was a waste-of-time & betrayal of libertarian principles, LOL) claims. Again, I don't know what more "evidence" you want than the mini-history lesson I provided in my original post.
White 'conservative' men (who allegedly want smaller govt. & less immigration) are the GOP's core constituency. These are the people who chose John "Open Borders" McCain & Mitt "Grandfather of ACA" Romney over RON FUCKING PAUL (whom I went door-to-door, talking to GOP households, for). So, I don't want to hear any bullshit about whites actually wanting small govt.
If white folks want smaller govt., it sure doesn't translate into reality via the nomination process, voting, civil-disobedience, or jury nullification...
"Evidence"...?
Are you retarded?
You've made a heap of assertions in direct opposition to the claims about white males advocating small government.
Where is your evidence?
Y'know - the information you use to verify your beliefs are in accordance with reality. Y'know, the thing that separates your bold assertions from fiction. Y'know, the data that proves you're not trying to spread lies and deceit. Evidence.
The dominant voting demographic when the major enabling legislation of the early-mid 20th century (Federal Reserve Act, Income Tax Amendment, Direct Election of Senators Amendment, New Deal-era Legislation/EOs, Great Society-era Legislation) for the Total State was enacted was WHITE, CHRISTIAN, SOCIALLY-CONSERVATIVE MEN.
This is a fact.
Another fact:
White men overwhelmingly chose John McCain & Mitt Romney over Ron Paul in the 2008 & 2012 GOP Primaries.
Its one thing to SAY you want smaller govt...its a different thing to actually WANT it.
I have nothing against white people, but Stef is really full of shit to suggest that whites have, anytime w/i the last 100+ years, seriously voted for smaller govt. Trump is no small-govt. guy either, he's just another in a LONG line of FDR-clones to occupy the White House.
When, not "if", but WHEN ZioShill Trump pulls a Reagan & grants amnesty, I'm gonna have a field day here on Stef's blog...and libertarian turncoat Molyneux won't be able to ban me from this platform like he has on others...
But what is your evidence... You've only made assertions. Stef has data to back up his claims. His claims have evidence to go along with his assertions.
Where is yourevidence?
Voting patterns is not enough.
I've listed my evidence...if you're too thick to see it, that's your problem.
Each & every bit of govt.-expanding legislation in the USA was done under white demographic majorities--FACT.
There is ZERO evidence that electing Republicans effects smaller govt. & fiscal responsibility (quite the opposite).
That's some shit evidence mate.
Your "evidence" seems to be: people voted and government got bigger. whites were a big demographic during these expansions and therefore whites want big government.
This is an interesting counter-point to be sure, but pretending what you've presented constitutes evidence to counter the thesis being presented kinda makes you the thick one.
But I appreciate the food for thought.
The point is that white majorities have NO connection to smaller govt., contrary to what the "new & improved" Stefan (I was following him back in 2008 when he said supporting Ron Paul was a waste-of-time & betrayal of libertarian principles, LOL) claims. Again, I don't know what more "evidence" you want than the mini-history lesson I provided in my original post.
White 'conservative' men (who allegedly want smaller govt. & less immigration) are the GOP's core constituency. These are the people who chose John "Open Borders" McCain & Mitt "Grandfather of ACA" Romney over RON FUCKING PAUL (whom I went door-to-door, talking to GOP households, for). So, I don't want to hear any bullshit about whites actually wanting small govt.
If white folks want smaller govt., it sure doesn't translate into reality via the nomination process, voting, civil-disobedience, or jury nullification...