Hi buddy, it's me again after reading and leaving my comment in your previous posts, the same thing I will do with this hahahahaha.

After the incident in Chernobyl, the town was devastated, the economy spiked in view of the serious economic damage that the accident caused, the number of inhabitants was considerably reduced, a great extension of territory was lost, which is important because of the fertility that the territory had, now all that is garbage, regrettably.

I would like to point out, my friend, that this accident was, together with the Fukushima I accident in Japan in 2011, considered to be the most serious on the International Nuclear Accident Scale, that is to say, a major accident, level 7, thus constituting one of the greatest environmental disasters in history.

Basically what happens is what is called presidentialism, the people are not participating in government decisions, mainly should participate in this which is very important, the people know that they do not want to suffer a loss of this size again, the president should reconsider spending all that money that increases its foreign debt and invest it in the improvement and growth of the economy for the benefit of the population.

Now answering your interesting rhetorical question of what it was:

Do the Belarusians need a nuclear power plant in Debt?

I can say very firmly that they do not need it at all. Although we already know that an accident generated in a plant can generate radioactivity, we know the danger of working to generate this energy, not in accordance with that there are other ways to generate renewable energy, inexhaustible and that would not have the danger of generating a level 7 environmental disaster, such as wind, solar and others, which would be less costly and more accepted in society.

Thank you very much for your information friend, always generating good content, greetings again from Venezuela, you are admired a friendly world @adsactly!!