Starmer's Orwellian Britain

Keir Starmer is a member of the Fabian Society, a historically influential socialist think tank. Founded in 1884, the Fabian Society has long been known for its mission to promote societal change aligned with socialist principles up to one hundred years into the future. Unlike revolutionary movements, Fabians believe in subtle incremental reform to shape the world according to long-term visions. While publicly advocating for progressive ideals, critics argue that the society operates as a covert oligarchic group, engineering societal changes that align with the interests of elite power structures, ( their emblem is a shield of a wolf dressed in sheep's clothing).

Aldous Huxley, celebrated author of Brave New World, was a prominent Fabian. His dystopian masterpiece is often interpreted as a chilling vision about the potential excesses of technocratic control and societal manipulation. However, Huxley's involvement in the Fabian Society raises questions about whether his work was entirely a personal vision or a narrative sponsored and crafted to reflect the society's broader goals. Notably, Huxley mentored George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair), introducing him to Fabian ideology. Orwell, later famous for writing and publishing his work 1984, might have also been influenced by these ideas, whether consciously or subconsciously.

Critics suggest that Orwell's work, like Huxley's, may have served as a form of predictive programming seeding acceptance of a dystopian future through the power of storytelling.

This tactic is not dissimilar to how Hollywood uses science fiction to familiarize audiences with potential realities, subtly shaping public expectations for the future. Far from being mere warnings, works like Brave New World and 1984 might be seen as blueprints of a controlled technocratic society envisioned by socialist oligarchs, embedding concepts into the collective subconscious to normalize these scenarios over time.

Keir Starmer's policies have raised alarm among British and International observers who fear his policies are steering Britain toward an Orwellian dystopia. Many argue that his approach reflects a Fabian inspired vision of societal engineering, normalizing measures perceived as authoritarian. Among these was Project Dawn which was launched this summer, involving the release of 5,000 violent offenders, such as murderers and rapists, after serving just 80% of their sentences and giving an apology, purportedly to make space for individuals accused of new "thought crimes." Critics highlight that such policies have already led to the criminalization of Britons for expressing their views on social media regarding the nation's struggles under his leadership. This is seen as a profound attack on free speech and open discourse.

Particularly controversial is his administration's targeting of both elderly pensioners for posting opinions on social media and young people who had planned to participate in public marches were arrested in their homes before they even went on such protests, more recently, even a man had been imprisoned for preaching verses from the Bible, in public. Starmer hopes that imprisoning them is a stark warning that dissent or "wrong thinking" will not be tolerated, his attempt to create an atmosphere of fear and compliance among the populace; to crush free speech and democracy. Instead this seems to be stimulating a backlash of growing resistance from the British public and international critics.

Moreover, Starmer's support for policies linked to the World Economic Forum's Agenda 2030 has drawn sharp criticism. Among these are stringent Net Zero initiatives and drastic agricultural reforms that could destroy national food production and jeopardize food security. Detractors argue these measures echo themes of control and engineered scarcity rather than work to resolving these problems with more reasonable solutions that are within the realistic scope of economy, energy and natural resources carrying capacity.

Instead, Net Zero also seems to be more aligned with Orwell’s dystopian narrative. Will Britons continue this route? If so they may be forced to choose between travel to work or heating their homes in winter months. Such policies, they contend, would pave the way for long-term widespread economic hardship, fostering greater dependence on centralized authority and eroding individual freedoms.

A Petition to British Parliament created by a local pub owner, Michael Westwood, demanding a Re- election has recently gone viral since yesterday, amassing over 2 million signatures within 24 hours, is a clear sign of public discontent, by the end of today, it is likely to reach over 3 million, hopefully encouraging Parliament to listen to the British People which it is supposed to be serving. British Parliament is constitutionally and morally obligated to serve the interests of the British people. As representatives elected by the public, Members of Parliament (MPs) are expected to act in the best interests of their constituents, uphold democratic principles, and ensure government accountability. This foundational concept is rooted in the principle of public service, where Parliament acts as a guardian of the people's rights, freedoms, and welfare.

Many see Starmer as one of the figures advancing the agendas of globalist elites, including Klaus Schwab and the Davos cohort, who envision a world of increased surveillance, economic centralization, and diminished national sovereignty.

As Britain faces a pivotal nexus about its future, the legacy of figures like Huxley and Orwell serves as a stark reminder of how narratives can shape societal direction, highlighting that these narratives were sponsored by those in the shadows manipulating social change. Whether Starmer is a continuation of this Fabian vision or simply aligned with its principles, the implications of his policies warrant scrutiny.

Will the unprecedented public outcry for a re-election be dismissed or will it be addressed, has the UK seen 2024 become 1984?