Sort:  

well @dwinblood said that verbal aggression is also something that violates the NAP. At least if I remember correctly. But I guess you Libertariantards are allowed to have different opinions ;).

For words to qualify as a violation of the NAP (or ZAP) they would have to constitute a credible threat-- the threatener has the intention to follow through with the threat and the means to actually carry it out.. Otherwise there is no actual aggression; just hot air.

I feel the same.

Good luck and success to you, Sir. I am off the platform.