RE: The #philosophy Review 12.6.2016
Sorry if Im coming off as an asshole as i am aware i often do that when not trying to. I have been having a long back and forth with the person so i guess that does qualify. i responded back to you on the other post and im tnking i should have responded back on this post as the response seems more fitting on this form. It was more me attacking the philosophy then e fact that he is playing games to avoid backing up his claims.
im going to copy and paste it in another reply to this post so as it might start up the conversation on this thread.
xD
Do you only look for posts that use the philosophy tag? i have troubles with the 5 tag rule and never know what to use.
lol
ps
sry bout the lack of care on the text. I nee coffee and a shower, spent to much time on last response.
cheers and steem on.
I'll be happy to keep the discussion going on here. Generally i don't think we disagree about the existence of facts, but since you elaborated i have some thoughts ; ) I'll reply above.
No worries about coming on strong, better that you care so much about dialectic that it gets heated than no discussion at all.
As far as the selection pool, i do limit to posts tagged as philosophy. I am certain there are relevant pieces that were not tagged as such, but just getting to the bottom of this channel is tough enough at times. An imperfect but necessary filter.
That said, feel free to call my attention to posts that need consideration. Maybe I should start a steemit chat to gather suggestions for future posts.
xD