The Blockchain Won’t Save Us
Photo by Mitchel Lensink on Unsplash
The Lack Of Information & Technology Is Not The Problem
The Steemit community is fantastic. It’s full of people with admiral goals and noble intent. Many believe that with vast amounts of new information and blockchain technology we will usher in a new era. Freedom from centralized governments and oligarchs is finally at hand!
I don’t think so and here’s why. History has repeatedly shown this not to be true. Every generation has it’s Zeitgeist filled with the promise of a new age. For instance from the 1990’s the general consensus has been that the internet would provide access to all the information we needed to change the world. In the 1980’s it was the computer and before that it was radio and television that promised to educate and free the masses. They said the same thing of Gutenberg’s movable type and the ability to mass produce books. I’d bet ancient scholars said the same thing about the invention of papyrus, stone tables and paintings on cave walls. This time it’s different! This is a game changer!
But they all made the same mistake thinking that all we ever needed was the distribution of more information. Access to better technology and more information was never the problem. The inability to distinguish factual information from misinformation is the problem. If we cannot discern fact from fiction more information will not help us.
"It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so." --Mark Twain
The Larger Problem
The inability to tell fact from fiction is a problem but it can be addressed with proper education. There is a larger, more insidious problem we all need to address and it is simply this; once a belief is accepted as true it is nearly impossible to change that belief. In order to change a deeply held belief we must go through some very unpleasant emotions so we naturally try to avoid it. We are “sticking to our guns” and will not “flip-flop” on the issue.
Can I ask you a question? How do you feel when you’re wrong? Do you feel embarrassed, ashamed, humiliated or even guilty? Wrong! You don’t feel any of those things when you’re wrong – you feel them when you realize you’re wrong and most people will go to great lengths to avoid that realization and the associated emotions.
The availability of more information exacerbates the problem by overloading the believer and providing the misinformation needed to maintain false beliefs. The internet has made it extraordinarily easy to create our “own private Idaho’s,” where our beliefs remain safe and unchallenged.
It’s Time To Challenge Our Beliefs
The world is not made up of good guys and bad guys, it is made up of true beliefs and false beliefs. It is the false beliefs that make otherwise good people do bad things. Excluding psychopaths, most people really do mean well and would like to see a better world. It’s only when our false beliefs take control and make us feel the need to protect them that the problems start.
If we think of beliefs as parasitic replicators that infect our minds we can come to some interesting conclusions. Most animals don’t kill each other but we do rather excessively at times. Could it be because we have beliefs and animals only have instincts? Imagine a parasite that infects our minds then protects itself by making us, the hosts feel bad when it is threatened and actively tries to eradicate competing beliefs. This would explain everything from the Inquisition to the Holocaust.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
Anarchy & Decentralized Government
The notion that government is the problem and anarchy is the answer seems simplistic given the insight above. Governments are run by people with a set of beliefs that make up their worldview resulting in policies. Even corruption in government can be attributed to and justified by those beliefs.
In our “democracy” we the people elect those who supposedly share our beliefs and interests. This doesn’t seem to be working out that well not because of them, the elected but because of us the misinformed. Anarchy and decentralized government does not address that fundamental problem.
Remember that there will always be a ‘lie’ in the middle of believe.
Photo by Chris Li
The Rich & Powerful
Even if we live in a democracy we all know that it’s the rich and powerful that run our government. It’s a wonder why anyone votes! But the rich and powerful aren’t “the bad guys” either. Sure they align their beliefs with their interests but they also have to live with themselves and they all believe they are “the good guys” so they must somehow justify those beliefs.
Take the Koch brothers for example. People on the left believe the Koch brothers to be greedy individuals hell-bent on power and riches at the expense of the earth. People on the right believe them to be small government Libertarians. Who could be against more liberty?!
Liberals tend to ignore all of the non-profit charitable organizations founded and supported by the Koch brothers and remember all the climate denying think tanks they support. How can you deny science?!
What’s interesting here is not how good or bad the Koch brothers are but how we perceive them based on our beliefs. There is evidence for both sides but we see only what our beliefs allow us to see.
You can apply this way of thinking to anyone, even the worst of the worst. The most greedy, narcissistic, egomaniacal despots in history had belief systems that made them “bad.” But if they couldn’t convince others to believe in the same things, they had no power. We the believers allowed them to do what they did. We are ultimately responsible for our beliefs and the good or bad that results from them.
What Will Save Us
Whether or not you accept that our beliefs control us literally or figuratively doesn’t matter because the resulting solutions arrived at are sound. Epistemology and critical thinking skills should be required in our schools. Examples of how easily we can be fooled into believing things that are not true should be taught early and often. History should be viewed from the perspective of a few leaders deluding the many followers. These steps would help to inoculate us from false beliefs.
Technology and the blockchain won’t save us. Only our ability to discern fact from fiction will save us.
I would like to thank kennyskitchen for inspiring this post and I encourage you to read his post: "Let's Achieve Anarchy, Before We Argue About Adjectives"
Comments are appreciated and thanks for reading.
It's like hearing Socrates again, ''Vice is ignorance''.
I believe that we live in the age of scientism, where a certain kind of ''logic'' has been established and dictates what is what in many fields of life in general, not just science.
I agree with you totally on this, epistemology and critical thinking are indispensable allies in order to discern what indeed constitutes a bad belief from a false belief. The key is discernment and it's indeed what we must strive for.
I recommed reading Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable in case you haven't. Trust me on that. Great post!
I’m no Socrates but I like the comparison! I looked up the quote:
He got it right long before I did, I’m just suggesting the reason behind it.
I did read “The Black Swan” after the 2008 crash an liked it so much I read his other book: “Fooled by Randomness” which is also a good read. Taleb is an interesting character. He does the opposite of conventional wisdom. He’s always playing many small “long shots” for big wins and it works for him!
Great comment and insights! Thanks so much for the reply.
I agree with you 100%. The blockchain will help us though lol. I do believe that we need to actually do a lot more though and really believe in a better world and make that change. We need more people we need everyone and we need love. I think that we can make this change eventually. Great post my friend
Most people’s hearts are in the right place it’s when their minds get hijacked we see the bad behavior. I think we’ll eventually get it right once we better understand each other. The blockchain should spread the wealth around more equitably and that would definitely be a good thing. Thanks for the reply.
I agree. That's why they've been brainwashing people forever. MKULTRA mind control, the school system, news, Hollywood movies everything.
Very interesting post, I enjoyed reading it.
I do not think there is a clear future - one that can predict now.
People say you should learn from history, so it does not repeat itself, In practice, this does not happen, We will continue to make the same mistakes only in other ways.
Regarding the current approach to information (in any way)With regard to the current approach to information (in any way)
People are becoming more educated and ask more questions - I think it's a good thing.
A very astute observation! In fact I almost included Santayana’s quote in the post. I think we keep repeating the past because we don’t understand the problem. It’s like not knowing what causes the disease. As I like to say, if you believe disease is caused by witchcraft, you burn witches. If you believe disease is caused by microorganisms you wash your hands. One belief causes enormous human suffering and doesn’t work. The other causes no suffering and does work.
It’s important to get our beliefs aligned with reality.
I agree with you completely
There are misconceptions on what the blockchain is supposed to do, and I believe you are right. The blockchain won't exactly save us from centralized governments. I do believe that it does save us from what many see as the inevitable failure of fiat currencies that are not backed by anything. There are a lot of 'problems' and I say this loosely because many times solving problems is more like finding a more efficient way to perform a task we as humans found tedious to perform.
I believe blockchain is a game changer to the money market, and how wealth is transacted globally. This in turn can help spread more information faster, however like you said -- differentiating between misinformation and information can be difficult. Certainly not a huge game changer to the freedom market but I feel it's a step in the right direction. Anarchy is a whole different topic because modern society has taught us that it is bad so one should take a deeper look into what anarchy is and isn't, and we've come full circle trying to differentiate between information and disinformation.
I actually did some research on the word anarchy before writing the post and struggled a little knowing there would be some disagreement on the meaning. The general perception of a chaotic, leaderless society or the newer political philosophy of the abolition of traditional government. In my mind people need leadership of some kind so we don’t devolve into a “Lord of the Flies” situation. It will ultimately come down to where we draw the lines and that’s when reality based beliefs matter the most.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
Thanks for responding! As I read your post I recalled vaguely reading about anarchy a while back and the disagreement on its meaning. After doing some more minor research last night on anarchy I came to the same conclusion. In a perfect world anarchy could work peacefully, but alas, we've all read "Lord of the Flies" and know that once humans are added to the equation, the outcome is unpredictable.
This makes me angry. Not because of the content (I loved that) but because it is so infuriatingly undervalued. Far crappier posts are getting massive votes.
As for your actual post, you make some very important points about the current state of affairs in the world online and offline. We used to have ignorance, now we have apathy born of too much information, too much news, too much data. We no longer care about truth and lies because we are too tired to care.
Beyond that, you make interesting points about people doing bad things because they have mistaken beliefs and would rather do insane things to protect those beliefs than suffer the pain of admitting they are wrong. Then you took a dip into memes -- as in, actual memes in the "informational replicator" sense as opposed to the joke pics we call memes today.
When people care more about the maintenance of their beliefs than they do about the truth, we’re all in trouble. This blog is meant to not only call attention to the problem but suggest solutions. I’m glad you enjoyed the post.
Thanks so much for the kind words, I really appreciate it!