You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Strong Proof: On Omnipotence

in #philosophy6 years ago

I don't see the distinction. I think you're doing the exact same thing but you're telling yourself you aren't.

A single omnipotent creator is a logical necessity if you want to avoid an infinite regression loop. A necessary being can't be destroyed logically, so the structure of your statement is illogical.

BTW, I'm not picking at you, I just find the topic interesting.

Sort:  

A single creator is necessary to avoid an infinite regress, not an omnipotent one.

Well, what would you call a being who created the universe with it's infinite size and complexity?

No worries, I appreciate that you're engaging...that's the point, to discuss and disagree, to discuss and hopefully agree.

I'll respond more directly to your critique shortly.