I actually had far higher expectations of Wray, after the Enron prosecution.
I have clearly misunderstood how such predators operate. I am reminded of certain sharks, in which multiple zygotes are initially spawned in the womb, without a placenta or yolk to sustain their growth to birth weight. Instead, the foetal sharks eat each other, until the survivors are large enough to be born.
This seems to explain certain policies Shrub Sr. undertook, such as the war in Panama, and the first war in Iraq, in which he turned on his strongest allies, and how Iraq was handed over to Iran as a result of US operations in the theater. I am also reminded of the assassination of Achmed Shah Masood, who publicly warned of the 9/11 attack on 9/10 in a press conference in Paris, by ISI operatives who were probably unaware of the suicide bombs in their camera equipment.
The concept of feeding on their brothers and sisters in the womb seems to well characterize the nature of Imperial personnel in this latter phase of the birth pangs of the world to come. As a result I do not anticipate any outcome free and sovereign people would find remotely acceptable in the design and implementation of social order that can be projected based on the plans of the surviving Imperial sharks after it is born.
Thanks!
some interesting cases for me to add to my considerations
at this point, it doesn't matter to much to me how the Deep State is configured as much as it does that they interfere with my life (and i have an instinctual opposition to this kind of set up, I think)
one thing to think about is how the majority of people (the normies) think, b/c it is with their implied support that the Deep State operates, legal or not. Too many people live the good life and/or have their decision-making handled for them for active resistance.
I'll need to dig up the typology me & you worked out...
The Wisdom of @valued-customer: A classification system based on the political nature of humanity
So we're looking at H. domesticus as part of the problem.
I think that it falls to H. vigilus to set things straight, regardless of how much he is in the minority. There are a few problems with this (to address in a full post, I think) but the biggest would be to avoid the temptation to power and morphing into H. machiavellus
other thoughts:
Well said in all respects, and I am happy that I am yet useful to add to the discussion.
Of course, this is the ever present danger, the dangling hook that has always been offered to those competent to dodge the obstacles impeding success.
Thanks!