Upvote Shares Level 18 "Sold Out"
I'm honestly quite shocked what's been going on on Steemit with the whale / ocd flagging war on every kind of bid bot or tribe upvote which is highly inconsistent and simply bullies small / mid-sized accounts making it impossible for them to get anything going unless they are lucky to be inside of the curation circle. (Read @ocd Downvotes Reply and many more of these posts by people that have been targeted)
I won't do anything impulsive just yet shutting down this project paying back all the invested steem to the shareholders, but it might take longer to open up new levels as steem right now fell down on my priority list and I won't be putting nearly as much time into it anymore.
The minimum promised upvote % for each share currently is 1.05% (1000 / 950 Shares). With many inactive shares and shareholders that gave up on the platform or aren't making a post every day, it is currently set at 3.00% making sure all unused upvotes flow back to active shareholders exactly as the model was designed.
Each share represents an equal % of the Powered Up SP in the account. This puts the base value for each share currently at (4751SP/ 950 Shares) = 5.001 STEEM. Curation Reward Dividends were also introduced and they will be paid out every time a new level is about to open up. (See First payouts)
List of All Shareholders
| - | Account | Shares | Minimum | Expected | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | @minnowshares | 35 | 36,86% | - | |
| - | Future Giveaways | 20 | 21,06% | - | |
| - | Burned Shares | 9 | 9,48% | - | |
| 1 | @roleerob | 100 | 105,30% | 100% | |
| 2 | @costanza | 100 | 105,30% | 100% | + 5 |
| 3 | @macoolette | 67 | 70,55% | 100% | + 9 |
| 4 | @glastar | 52 | 54,76% | 100% | + 2 |
| 5 | @trincowski | 39 | 41,07% | 100% | + 2 |
| 6 | @jlordc | 37 | 38,96% | 100% | + 2 |
| 7 | @newageinv | 31 | 32,64% | 93% | |
| 8 | @byebyehamburgers | 29 | 30,54% | 87% | + 1 |
| 9 | @fullcoverbetting | 27 | 28,43% | 81% | |
| 10 | @abh12345 | 24 | 25,27% | 72% | + 2 |
| 11 | @braaiboy | 20 | 21,06% | 60% | |
| 12 | @stimp1024 | 19 | 20,01% | 57% | |
| 13 | @meesterboom | 19 | 20,01% | 57% | + 10 |
| 14 | @blanchy | 17 | 17,90% | 51% | |
| 15 | @mango-juice | 15 | 15,80% | 45% | |
| 16 | @bashadow | 14 | 14,74% | 42% | + 1 |
| 17 | @erikklok | 13 | 13,69% | 39% | |
| 18 | @fredkese | 12 | 12,64% | 36% | |
| 19 | @andrewharland | 11 | 11,58% | 33% | |
| 20 | @o07 | 11 | 11,58% | 33% | |
| 21 | @pifc | 11 | 11,58% | 33% | |
| 22 | @plantstoplanks | 11 | 11,58% | 33% | |
| 23 | @angelacs | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 24 | @doughtaker | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 25 | @thedarkhorse | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 26 | @romeskie | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 27 | @barbara-orenya | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 28 | @ervin-lemark | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | |
| 29 | @sportfrei | 10 | 10,53% | 30% | + 5 |
| 30 | @incubot | 9 | 9,48% | 27% | |
| 31 | @bengy | 7 | 7,37% | 21% | |
| 32 | @simplymike | 7 | 7,37% | 21% | |
| 33 | @beat-the-bookies | 7 | 7,37% | 21% | |
| 34 | @revisesociology | 6 | 6,32% | 18% | |
| 35 | @barbadosso | 5 | 5,27% | 15% | |
| 36 | @maarnio | 4 | 4,21% | 12% | |
| 37 | @shookriya | 4 | 4,21% | 12% | |
| 38 | @cicisaja | 4 | 4,21% | 12% | |
| 39 | @lawlees | 3 | 3,16% | 9% | |
| 40 | @tryskele | 3 | 3,16% | 9% | |
| 41 | @lynncoyle1 | 3 | 3,16% | 9% | |
| 42 | @crypto-econom1st | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 43 | @wolfhart | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 44 | @mermaidvampire | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 45 | @acidyo | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 46 | @nanzo-scoop | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 47 | @acelad | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 48 | @jznsamuel | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 49 | @balticbadger | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 50 | @craigcryptoking | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 51 | @insight-out | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 52 | @minnowbuilder | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 53 | @celinavisaez | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 54 | @patriamreminisci | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 55 | @blessed-girl | 2 | 2,11% | 6% | |
| 56 | @fitat40 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 57 | @lenasveganliving | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 58 | @woman-onthe-wing | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 59 | @steevc | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 60 | @slobberchops | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 61 | @numpypython | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 62 | @fulltimegeek | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 63 | @themanwithnoname | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 64 | @rishi556 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 65 | @lovetaxi005 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 66 | @veryspider | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 67 | @eoj | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 68 | @mmunited | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 69 | @keegzhawkins | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 70 | @adelair | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 71 | @viking-ventures | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 72 | @el-nailul | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 73 | @buckaroo | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 74 | @marya77 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 75 | @team-ccc | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 76 | @janton | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 77 | @minnowbuilder2 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 78 | @puravidaville | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 79 | @gamercrypto | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 80 | @theonlyway | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 81 | @minnowbuilder3 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 82 | @alexbiojs | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 83 | @happyme | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 84 | @jaynie | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 85 | @nonsowrites | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 86 | @oliviackl | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 87 | @beerlover | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 88 | @johannpiber | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 89 | @phortun | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 90 | @amico | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 91 | @gillianpearce | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 92 | @shasta | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 93 | @minnowbuilder4 | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 94 | @curatorcat | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 95 | @playdice | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| 96 | @mimismartypants | 1 | 1,05% | 3% | |
| - | Unassigned Shares | 6 | - | - |
Next Post
Monday 14/10/2019 Upvote Shares Level 18 (100% Complete)
The downvotes are being used on a lot of people who are purely buying votes for profit and I see that as good. They should earn their rewards. We do have to be careful not to drive good people away. I've engaged with a few to try and guide them to a better path.
I 100% agree with using the free downvotes for shit content that gets pushed into trending or pure farming behavior. But to go on a crusade to blindly start downvoting every single bid bot / tribe bot upvote and only 'honest curation' is what it's all about is extremely inconsistent an hypocritical. This would mean they also have to target and kill the Actifit project who trades AFIT tokens for upvotes. Also the idea that upvotes to posts that get more upvotes are worth more is just insane and makes it impossible for anyone outside of the curation circle to get anything going.
I agree with you on that. It's like the whales are trying to turn Steem into a private club, where new users aren't welcomed.
That's not in their interest as falling user numbers will not help the Steem price and a lot of whales paid more for what they have. There are good and bad whales. Work with those who are don't good for the platform.
Hmmm... I hope you continue the program and don't end it just because of some abusing whales. In fact, I'm hoping to get 3 more shares into the program, if you keep it up.
No worries, I do fully intend to keep things running an progressing. The progression pace might slow down a bit the next couple on months but upvotes continue as usual and give quite good returns still.
Thanks for the support!
Congratulations @upvoteshares! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Indeed really strange things are happening! I really don't see how those things could push steem any further.
Mhh, on the other side they are pushing steem further to the abyss!
Have a !BEER
Cheers,
Peter
View or trade
BEER.Hey @upvoteshares, here is a little bit of
BEERfor you. Enjoy it!Not spending the time on our Steem blockchain I once did @upvoteshares / @costanza ...
... I was saddened to read this. But ... Not surprised, as I have had my own reservations, but for the most part anyway, have not taken the time to voice my opinion. As there are simply more profitable things to do with my time ...
Glancing through your referenced post you made (sorry, I don't have the time to invest into reading it as thoroughly as I might like ...), I noted the reference to the damage being done to "smaller" accounts. Like mere dolphin-sized accounts ... As well as the benefit accruing inside certain uhhh ... "circles."
Well, like you, I won't do anything rash, although again my time "in here" has diminished ...
Gracias por mantenernos informados! un abrazo @upvoteshares.