You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Tone Vays vs Roger Ver debate on BTC vs BCH as 'hard currency'.

in #notoriginalcontent • 6 years ago

This is such a dumb debate. It's fiat with a cap on the printing. It still can't scale, it's still volatile, it still has no intrinsic demand, it's expensive to transact, and its large server farms and pools can still be regulated by governments. Both have the same problems. One is controlled by Bilderberg, and one is controlled by people who lie about what blockchains do the most transactions for the benefit of their portfolios. The Bitcoin community needs to stop having these pointless debates and pay attention to the real innovation. That's where the real competition is.

6 years ago in #notoriginalcontent by
$Na
  • Past Payouts $0.03, 0.00 TRX
  • - Author $0.02, 0.00 TRX
  • - Curators $0.01, 0.00 TRX
3 votes
Reply 1
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    Finally a comment in this whole thread worth commenting on.

    This whole discussion is like listening someone arguing if a 3hp steam engine is better then a 3.1hp steam engine while V12s are being built.

    I mean its ridiculous. This just shows the idiocy of the market. Artificially creating "competition" between x and y obsolete tech as to spark more interest and create more focus on 2 cryptocoins.
    I mean, that is the cheapest and most transparent marketing strategy.
    And it worked. @transisto and another user got into a somewhat heated discussion over it. People are commenting, etc.

    Samsung vs iphone, mcdonalds vs burger king, coke vs pepsi, xbox vs playstation.
    You create some drama, drama draws attention, 2 camps form, more drama insues and more attention is brought to the discussion. Both sides win.
    Btc or bch? Neither has the potential to be a store of value nor a currency with wide adoption.