Sort:  

and yet.
they did cheat.
there is evidence that they did so.

Ah, I guess both parties cheat, that used to happen here when it was just two parties also, now we have more parties and I guess the cheating will just be bigger.

have you any evidence to back up your assertion that both parties cheat?

No Everitt, only common sense, if one politician cheats all of them cheat. But I can ask you the same thing, do you have any evidence the Democrat's cheated, apart from a lot of alt-right "news" sources? All of these guys play with people, it is up to you to sort it out.
And I do have proof, what is gerrymandering if not cheating? And both parties do this.

VERY GOOD....change the terminology...bring in straw men...and other logical fallacies.
oh...I forgot projection.
"if we do it the other guy must do it too"
sorry...how could I have forgotten that part?

You got me there I don't exactly know what a straw man is.

ah...a teaching opportunity..

strawman

You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.

Example: After Will said that we should put more money into health and education, Warren responded by saying that he was surprised that Will hates our country so much that he wants to leave it defenseless by cutting military spending.

thou shalt not commit logical fallacies

What I lack in creativity I make up for in logic, I see nothing illogical about what I have written. You on the other hand tend to be more creative, which in fact I admire.