You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: HF21 + Anti-Retaliatory Downvoting System (Proposal) = A Functional STEEM/Steemit

in #newsteem5 years ago

Thank you for putting this together.
I came across a shit of a post by a whale that bragged about all the money he was making "curating" which he described as watching numbers and not reading a thing. His post made in excess of $70. I was afraid to downvote it, despite it's being a total piece of shit, because I feared retribution. So you've got that right.
And I am suddenly getting downvotes for no reason at all! They have not harmed me financially at all, but they are a bummer!
I am against downvotes of any kind. It has introduced a kind of violence that I do not want in my life on steem.
And I can think of a shortcoming that compromises "the Central Premise that: "Content Shall Be Compensated Commensurate With Its Quality." and that is the upvote curve. If a post is not making anything, say $.01, my 100% upvote is worth far less than it would be were I upvoting a post that will make over $20. Even at $20 though, my upvote is still not "buying" what it should be. So a newbie posting great content would likely earn nothing at all, unless a Big happens by and slaps them.

Sort:  

@owasco,

The whale you described ... is, alas, why we need retaliatory-free downvoting. I hate to say it, but communities in excess of 150 people (Dunbar's Number) simply don't function absent law enforcement. Carrots aren't enough, you need sticks. Why? Because there's always an asshole. And, because wherever there's a concentration of capital, there will be a concentration of crooks.

"Utopia" means "No Where" for a reason.

If you haven't yet read it, I wrote about this quite extensively in https://steemit.com/steemit/@quillfire/central-premise-and-proposals-a-series-about-fixing-steemit-part-4

Quill