97% Global Warming Consensus EXPOSED By Dr. Tim Ball
In this video, I talk with Dr. Tim Ball, PhD about the vast propaganda forced on the public via the media and the government regarding climate change (or global warming, or global cooling, whatever it is this week).
Dr.Ball who was a professor from the geography department at the University of Winnipeg and is one of the leading voices against the anthropogenic global warming fear has been studying climate for half a century and has published multiple books on the subject, investigating why this propaganda is shoved onto the populace and what it will lead to.
Having debated people like Elizabeth May, Dr. Ball is a wealth of information on the subject. He debunks the 97% consensus which he points out, if there's a consensus it's not science.
This all goes back to the United Nations, the IPCC and The Club of Rome with Maurice Strong, Gro Harlem Brundtland and others plotting to restrict industry, create a problem, a reaction and a solution and force the populace into complete dependency which we are seeing today with the green agenda.
Of course government is the world's biggest polluter and they have the nerve to tell us how to live with crippling taxes and regulation with very little to no understanding of the ramifications and real world problems.
Dr. Ball breaks down as much as he can in just under an hour. We are sure to have him back again soon to break this down further. It's so incredibly extensive it's impossible to fit in under 10 hours. Seriously!
See the FULL video interview here:
Stay tuned for more from WAM! Don't forget to Upvote & Follow!
If you like what I do, you can donate to my Bitcoin, Dash or DigiByte addresses below! :)
Bitcoin:
Dash:
DigiByte:
That's cool Dr. Ball was speaking in Abbotsford, BC Canada
16:40 on video
If you were to 4X the number of people living in your bedroom, what effect would that have on the room?
My point is those that deny climate change are missing this simple point imo. The population boom has taken place over the last 100 years is insane! Or take a look at the changes of any city over the last 200 years... it's massive! We've changed the world drastically but it has no impact on the Earth? All the food, products, and services we consume- not to mention travel- and it all has no effect? I find that insanely hard to believe.
While there may be an expert that disagrees with me on climate change, there is an expert for anything these days. #Internet is fueling nonsenical arguments to confirm any and all biases out there! WWII forecasting really shouldn't be considered in 2018 eh? That was before we had computers or many other scientific discoveries of the modern world!!
I could go on too about there is no consensus in science... when that is the very basis of science!! It is called a scientific theory and comes after the hypothesis :)
Just my 2 cents! Many Cheers!
The point is not that humans have "no effect" on climate. Of course we have an effect. But the effect is so small that it makes no sense to worry about it. It's like thinking that you can save money by taking a shower three times a week instead of five times a week. You're not going to save much money that way. You'd be better off moving to a place with cheaper rent, getting roommates, or getting more hours at your job, higher pay, etc.
In the same way, if the Earth is warming, you need air conditioning. If storms are becoming more numerous, you need better early warning systems and better means of transportation to get out of places hit by a storm. You need to invest in technologies that protect you from adverse climate.
The alternative is to reduce energy consumption, which will make you more vulnerable to the climate. After all, air conditioners burn energy. And burning energy produces CO2. So, ironically, being concerned about global warming will make the Earth more, not less, inhospitable to humans.
At the same time, reducing energy consumption will not actually stop the Earth from warming. In order to stop the Earth from warming by reducing CO2 emissions, we would have to reduce the amount of volcanoes erupting and respiration by humans and animals. But this is impossible. We don't have that kind of control over nature.
So the issue is not that the burning of fossil fuels has no effect on climate. It's that the emphasis on fossil fuels is misplaced when there are so many other things that emit CO2. And, fundamentally, it's a flawed belief to think that human beings can control the climate. We're just not powerful enough to do that.
Thanks for the reply my friend :)
I don't quite understand the 3 showers in a day versus 5 in a week. Perhaps you could explain how this is relevant to climate change caused by humans?
Also, how does being concerned about protecting the climate make it more of an adverse climate? That makes little sense to me, as if I invest energy into anything to take care of it- it will last longer.
As far as I know, Volcano emissions account for less than 1% of total greenhouse gases. Most are our generated from our food supply and transportation/industry. Frankly though finding this evidence is probably not worth my time hunting but I happy to if it'd help someone come around to a more logical approach to human-caused climate change.
I'll give you this, on a single person basis, no one is powerful enough to create climate change. Yet, multiply that number by the 7.7 billion people and you certainly have changed the equation. The fun fact too about how BIG a billion really is... if you earned $1 / second it'd only take around 12 minutes to get to a million bucks. Want to get to a single billion? Now, wait for 31.7 years!! It's exponentially different and frankly few people need to use exponential values ever in life.
Anywho, I appreciate anyone who can have a civil disagreement. Without discourse, the world would be flat LOL Get it? Excuse me for the pun there but the bottom line, we should have serious conversations about the earth and it's health since we all live here. I'd be thrilled to say I'm wrong about climate change! I just don't see the evidence for that. Please show it to me and I'd be happy to chime in for the anti-climate change debate. It must be fact-based because we all live on Earth and the importance of this debate cannot be understated.
Love and respect <3
so why are you still using youtube and not dtube mate
If you asked me, I could tell you, heading to Christmas and no snow doesn't feel right in my region.
Research "The Grand Solar Minimum", there is little man can do against the backdrop of the Sun, emitting less energy, while volcanoes will increase in explosive atmosphere dimming particulates. Along with Earth naturally orbiting an additional 1 million miles this year and an additional 1 million miles the next, away from the sun. You will be wishing we had global warming in 2020.
Still no one mentions the SUN ☀️ ⁉️Only the largest variable in any equation of a scientific approach to this issue . That gigantic ball of flaming gas in the sky 🌌 our Milky Way . Amazing observation from my prospective that the entire world talks about some significant change going on , and that the STAR 💫 in our sky is never involved❓So what do you think is the math on that❓🤔