You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: If Steemit wants, I will interview the Trump porn star Stormy Daniels on dTube
Heres what trump having sex with a pornstar means for our country.......NOTHING. i dont care if Bill Clinton gets a blowjob. I dont care if trump does the same thing i would do if i had billions of dollars. If he is not doing his job as president then attack him for that. Not this bullshit.
if the payoff was illegal, then that's relevant.
As it appears the payout has nothing to do with Trump.
It's interesting to see the contrast, specifically in this field:
"if the payoff was illegal, then that's relevant",
The payoff for what, exactly? A voluntary exchange b/w 2 people, which happens to involve money and privacy?
Why is it illegal for her to make some money for keeping their personal business to themselves?
Why is this an issue to begin with?
A prostitute uses her body to make money, it's illegal.
A porn star uses her body to make money, it's perfectly legal.
The double standards should be addressed in this story more than anything else, for the simple sake of logical reasoning.
david, do some real journalism.
Correct me if I'm misfaken but the payoff has nothing to do with anything illegal it's just to shut her up so Melania doesn't find out. OOops.
In any case it's from before he even was President.
Trump has survived much worse accusations. I still love his first campaign speech man that was gold.
"And some I'm sure are good" lol.
Wrong, depending on the funding of the payoff, it might have been illegal
Trump illegally bombed Syria without Congressional approval. He did this based on the lie that the Syrian government attacked their own citizens for no reason. Trump's department of defense has even admitted there is no evidence that the gas used had any connection to the Syrian government.
That's the kind of bad shit I hate Trump over. I don't give a shit if he had sex with someone. Why should I when his military is doing genocide in Yemen? When his drones kill innocent children?
This is just continued politics. Obama did the same thing as a matter of fact, he was the first to make a move within that civil war.
I agree with you, however.
The federal government is a business and US business is mostly made on the backs of wars.
We should certainly be talking about the moral justifications of US government, both foreign and domestic.
Great comment.
People tend to not care about the suffering of others, if said others are too far away.
It should be accepted, not fought, because it's jsut damn ingrained in human nature.