You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Failing New York Times Reports That 52 Times ISIS "Used Chemical Arms" in Iraq and Syria

in #news7 years ago

I heard in the media that Assad's regime is responsible for the chemical weapons attacks. It doesn't matter who is responsible, it should never be allowed.

Sort:  

Very true, hopefully we can end all the global lawlessness. But I'm not sure forcefully deposing Assad would do anything but expand territory for radical Wahhabists, while risking a larger conflict with Russia.

I know Theodore Postol has questioned the official narrative of past attacks Assad has been blamed for so not sure how much you can trust the media and the government.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/assessment-of-white-house-intelligence-report-about-nerve-agent-attack-in-khan-shaykhun-syria/5584867

https://www.globalresearch.ca/assessment-of-white-house-intelligence-report-about-nerve-agent-attack-in-khan-shaykhun-syria/5584867

It matters who is responsible. It is interesting that it only matters when we talk about chemicals. What about 90+% of the conventional killings, who is arming the opposition?

good point, is suffocating from gas that much worse than bleeding out from bullets or shrapnel?