New questions in the investigation of Russia

President Trump has claimed so many days, that he did not divulge any confidentiality with Russia in the 2016 election. The other side is required to assemble, I did not have any 'other party', Trump claimed.

Now Trump lawyer Rudy Juliani claims that if the accumulation is done then it is not a crime. The law is not an offense punishable by law. On the other hand, conspiracy is a credible crime, but to prove it, Trump has personally worked with Russia or with President Putin or has provided money in this work.

In an interview with CNN yesterday, Juliani commented that the hacking in the Democratic Party's computer system is an offense, but Trump is not associated with that crime. He is not hacking. Later, in an interview with Fox News, he argued that the crime could not be an offense, nor was a crime in any book of the law identified as a crime or a crime.

Since March 2007, the Special Judge of the Judiciary, Robert Müller sees the question of reconciliation with Russia in 2016 elections. He has already accumulated more than two dozen people associated with the Trump Campaign, among which many people have acknowledged their crimes and agreed to co-operate with Mulara's investigation. Although it is claimed that there is no consolidation or involvement from the White House, it is difficult to blame the fact that the evidence has already been collected. Perhaps that is why Trump's counsels are trying to centralize the question of obstructing trial rather than focusing on their attention. From Juliani's point of view, clear that Muller may be able to prove the point of collusion, but the accumulation is not a crime at all. As a result, there is no point in continuing investigations with this.

Before concluding the investigation, Mueller was interested in meeting with the trump. Juliani said Trump is ready to meet face to face with Müller, but the issue of intervention in the jurisdiction can not be raised there. This is not his investigation. In an interview with CNN, Julianne again made the same argument. Many of the trump and his lawyers have already said that no ruling party can be accused of obstructing justice. Everything he does in his executive duties as a president is all legal.

Meanwhile, in the same interview with CNN, another issue has sparked new debate, Juliani It has been said so long, in June 2016, Trump Jr. and Trump Campaign officials arranged for a meeting with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower, Trump himself did not know anything about it. Last week, Trump's former personal prosecutor Michael Cohen said that Trump did not just know that Trump had spoken to Trump Jr. about the meeting in his presence (Cohen).

Denied the meeting with Trump. After Copenhagen's new claims were published, he tweeted it in a tweet. But there was no doubt about it. It is thought that the Trump knew about this meeting, probably the collection of evidence from the magician probably collected. That's why legal experts of the trump decided to adopt a new strategy. Juliani now says, whether Trump knew about that meeting or not, that's not a big deal. The big thing is, whether he was in that meeting or not. Juliane stressed CNN, no, the trump was not there. "I would like to inform Robert Mueller that there was no trump in this meeting." Therefore, he can not be accused of questioning with Russia.