You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The New United States of America

in #news7 years ago

I agree with your conclusions and the dividing up of The US is nothing new.

However, the war of northern aggression was never about slavery.
It was about whether states had a right to leave the union.

Lincoln proved, through military might, that the states do not have a right to leave the union. But also, in the same act, declared the union null and void. At that point the republic was dead. The government abandoned.

Lincoln sent home congress, and they never returned.

What exists now is The United States Inc and it exists with powers above the states. It only gives lip service to states making their own laws.


Now, California. It is only that area up near the bay that is the problem. The rest of the state is almost all red. (except LA is 50/50)

The general consensus outside of the bay area is that those people in govern-cement are insane. Driving business from the state, and then ignoring the facts. Cutting off water for farming, because the water is needed for a brine shrimp. Etc...

Sort:  

However, the war of northern aggression was never about slavery.
It was about whether states had a right to leave the union.

Uh...that's what I said. The reason for leaving was for slavery, but the war was about whether or not a state could leave, because it isn't outlined in the Constitution that they can leave.

Now, California. It is only that area up near the bay that is the problem. The rest of the state is almost all red. (except LA is 50/50)

The problem is the gap between West Texas and the west coast of California. Sacrifices have to be made.

Noooooo, don't leave me to fend for myself!

Maybe i could develop a earthquake ray, and then hasten the splitting off of the bay area from the rest of the state.

It is possible that the State of Jefferson could stretch down the east side of the former state of California.

Yep. The central valley is hard to determine which way it would go. The large rancheros that have existed before Kalifornia are still very much Mexican at heart. But many of the farmers are Jeffersonians.

So, i really don't know which way they would go.

However, there will be the state of Mormon. Because they will defend it, and no one will want to dispute them for the area. (you'all can have it)

This is kinda interesting addition to that thought from history.

Looks almost like New North Mexico.

The Mormons can fight Mexico for territory, they've got history with being brutal.

Speaking of earthquake alerts on the bay...off the cost of Ferndale !

It wasn't me!
I didn't do anything!
No one saw me!