You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: EPIC: Google's Leaked Document On Their Censorship Of The Web: 'The Good Censor' - What I Learned About Their Logic & How Steem Can Leverage Their Failures. (Part 1)
If the truth was that then it's more accurate to say that "dogs are scary" is a prejudice, not a judgement. Judging is discerning, there's no reason to say that discernment always involves some kind of denial or that they have us thinking apples are oranges. Prejudices and bias on the other hand may very well describe what you said.
Humans should develop within themselves the power to judge over good and evil and to correctly perceive all things, so that they may be wise and fair and follow the laws.
Posted using Partiko Android
For me, judgement is not discernment. Discernment leaves space open for change - whereas judgements are outside of time and continue to have a lasting effect in self long after they are formed. Discernment notices the differences in things, whereas judgement has a blanket quality that denies details in favor of quick (and typically false) conclusions.
I've just pointed out that prejudice and bias is more accurate for the example you gave, do you not agree? Now the question is why do you see a difference between discernment and judgement? It's as if you have a prejudice against the word itself, because discernment and judgement are interchangeable and describe the very same act.
Posted using Partiko Android