You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New research suggest that managed fires in the African savannah leads to increased species richness, and promote certain rare savannah species

in #nature7 years ago (edited)

The U.S. government agencies that manage federal lands in similar ecosystems of the U.S. Southwest have found the same thing. The biologists call them "fire-adapted ecosystems."

In the case of the forests especially, they've found that controlled, regular fire not only improves the ecosystem, it prevents damage from hotter fires. They call controlled fires of woodlands and grasslands "prescribed burning."

When fires aren't frequent enough, trees, undergrowth, and fallen material become too plentiful. Then when a fire does occur, it burns so hot that it kills roots, mycelium, and microorganisms in the soil, and burns up the mixed in detritus. What was soil becomes powdered rock, mere dust. Then it takes much longer for the land to recover. And in hilly and mountainous terrain, it leads to dangerous mudslides when it rains.

Sort:  

Thanks for sharing this with us, @vanholio! I'm sort of surprised that I did not come across this information when I researched for this post.

But it really does make sense that smaller fires can have this type of effect. I'm definitely going to have to read up on some fire ecology to learn more about this.

Again, thanks for sharing your knowledge with us!

The history of managing fire is out there on the web. But I got the bit about how the heat if a fire is good or bad from a forest service biologist who's seen it all firsthand. I have yet to read anything that says the same. I'm sure it's in science journals, but that's not for me.