Multilogin Reivew

Managing multiple browser profiles has become essential for marketers, affiliate specialists, and anyone working with numerous online identities. Among the tools designed for this purpose, Multilogin is one of the most well-known names. It allows users to create virtual browser profiles with unique fingerprints to avoid detection, making it easier to operate multiple accounts without getting flagged.

However, despite its popularity and powerful features, Multilogin is not perfect. In this review, we will focus on its main weaknesses so you can clearly understand where it might fall short - especially if you’re considering it for professional or personal use.

What is Multilogin?

Multilogin is an antidetect browser platform designed to manage multiple isolated browser environments. Each profile has its own fingerprint, cookies, local storage, and proxy settings. This makes it appear like a completely different real user from the perspective of websites and platforms.

Plans start at around €29/month and can go up to €159/month or more depending on the number of profiles and users.

While this setup sounds great in theory, there are several weaknesses that you should know before committing to the platform.

High pricing with limited features on lower plans

One of the biggest drawbacks of Multilogin is its cost. The entry-level plan already starts at €29/month, which might be too expensive for freelancers or small operations. Many of the more powerful features - such as higher profile limits, advanced automation, or multi-user collaboration - are locked behind more expensive plans.

There is also no free trial, which means you have to pay before testing whether it fits your needs. For new users or small projects, this can be a significant barrier to entry.

No mobile support and limited OS flexibility

Multilogin works only through a desktop application running in the background. It does not support direct mobile usage, which means you cannot run profiles from phones or tablets.

Additionally, during testing, Proxyway discovered that when you use a browser/OS configuration that doesn’t match your real operating system (for example, running Chrome/Windows on a Mac), fingerprint tests can fail. Tools like Pixelscan or CreepJS were able to detect these mismatches.

This limits your flexibility if you need to simulate different operating systems or if your work involves mobile-based environments.

Inconsistent antidetect performance

Multilogin is designed to prevent websites from linking your accounts together by masking fingerprints. While it works well when the fake environment matches your real system, its performance drops noticeably when there is a mismatch.

Proxyway reported lower fingerprint scores in cases where the browser and OS were different from the host machine. Some Firefox/Windows configurations also failed fingerprint checks completely.

This means that even though the tool is designed to hide your identity, a poorly configured profile can still expose you — which defeats its entire purpose.

Some features are still underdeveloped

Multilogin X is a big upgrade from version 6, but not all features have caught up.

For example, CookieRobot, a tool that automatically collects cookies from given URLs, still only exists in Multilogin 6 and has not yet been added to Multilogin X.

The interface also has small usability issues, like the inability to clearly see when a profile was last launched (you only see when it was last modified). There’s also no easy way to identify which profiles have notes attached.

These may sound like minor details, but they add friction when managing dozens or hundreds of profiles.

Automation is limited unless you pay more

Automation is crucial when working with multiple accounts, but Multilogin limits automation based on your plan.

The API in version 6 has lower rate limits, and advanced automation tools are mainly available in higher-tier plans. Some users have reported difficulties setting up headless libraries or scripting tasks, which can make automated workflows harder to build.

If you rely heavily on scraping, account creation, or other large-scale automated tasks, you may hit these limits quickly — unless you’re ready to pay for the more expensive packages.

Migration risks and version fragmentation

Multilogin 6 is being phased out, and users are encouraged to switch to Multilogin X. While X offers new features, migrating profiles from version 6 can be risky.

Some features from 6 (like CookieRobot) are not yet fully available on X, and the transition process can be error-prone. Users may also face a learning curve as the interface and workflow differ significantly.

This can cause disruption if your business relies on stable, uninterrupted access to your browser profiles.

User experience quirks

Finally, there are a few small but noticeable UX issues:

• No free trial makes testing the platform difficult.
• You can’t easily see which profiles are currently active or recently used.
• Cloud profile storage raises security questions for some users.
• Setting up profiles correctly requires a good understanding of browser fingerprinting, which can overwhelm beginners.

Individually, these may seem minor, but together they can make daily use less smooth and more frustrating - especially for new users.

Final Verdict: Is Multilogin worth it despite these weaknesses?

Multilogin is still a powerful and reliable tool for managing multiple browser profiles, especially for agencies, marketing teams, or advanced users who need strong infrastructure and don’t mind paying for it.

However, its weaknesses can be deal-breakers for smaller users, beginners, or anyone who values mobile access, easy automation, or a lower entry cost. The inconsistent antidetect browser performance when using mismatched OS/browser setups also requires careful configuration, which can be risky for less experienced users.

If you decide to use Multilogin, be prepared to spend time learning how to properly configure fingerprints, invest in quality proxies, and possibly pay for higher plans to unlock its full potential.