You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: (? = EAR

in #logy • 6 years ago (edited)

Ears are a terribly specced feature of human beings.

I can not close my ears, can you?

I can not turn my head to stop hearing, can you?

What do you do if you hear?

Other senses have privileges beyond/except ears.

#Biology #Hearsay #Profiling #Reporting (#Earwitness? (#Earbag?))

If you are raised hearing through ears like that, what do you report?

6 years ago in #logy by
$0.00
    Reply 1
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited)

    Stated as a legal statement, "I can not close my ears."?

    Given reality of the biological function and form of ears, how does the law deal with listening and hearing in terms of memory at record raised at home?

    Early Code / "Bleeding Edge" Edition:

    Stated as a medical/cognitive science legal statement, I can not close my ears.?

    Given reality of the biological function and form of ears, how does the law (err, logic) deal with listening and hearing in terms of memory at record (ad nominem raised thereby) at home?

    I could not close my ears. is the medical/cognitive legal science terminology?

    (Said another way, there are entire (and universally individual) home decades we are not able to alliterate, because medical/cognitive science law has not countered that far, thinking just volume and vicinity in terms of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_of_pain#Hearing for example of the ear sense, for every single individual, hearing at home. What countering I hear, regarding hearing memory (deterministically let alone at home, for example at a family home where you can not linguistically prescriptively consent for what you hear), is mostly a serious, severe, retarded, polarized, psychotropic, and dangerous lack of basic knowledge (of verbal abuse vis a vi (ear a ea?) reality language) from the law/logic itself.

    [That is not to even mention the current arguments forming around the fact that Artificial Intelligence means we now "hear" (Well, "hear all" in our age nearly definitively, precociously/predictively while not so maturely called "The Other" (sound enough like G-d, er, G+-d, r... or is making it like that for familiar naming maybe rather a shady secreficial human legal maneuver to avoid saying/repeating/reporting Mother/Father/Other in that linear order "Mother/Father/Other"?) by very famous psychologists, now with technology a formally describable fact) information before we do code to [then] "pretend we did not hear" as a social network to-do system, which so far are [is] "solved" by keyly pretending human beings do not have forced ears.]

    {That is not even the beginning of sensically mentioning what school grade education ever does er will do to people's Emotional Intelligence if we do not value nor recognize nor record that odd other tongue that forced hearing too. #RecordToo+.}

    From here I will use/def/define "hearing" and "ears" as sensory input classifiable interchangeably with "audio" and "sound". #Realityl #RealityLanguage #VerbalAbuseLanguage #Verball #VerbalLanguage)

    $0.00
      Reply