You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Mustang - Part III
There's only the world ocean. If you want to play name games, there are seven seas, as well. What's the difference? More importantly what's the point? Why are you defending this lie so desperately? This you should ask yourself, not me.
I already told you once. Now I've told you twice. You can take it from here.
I'm not playing games, and denying that there are 5 oceans won't make the fact that there are five oceans a Lie. It's a matter of convention after all, if you know why there are 5 oceans, or why continents aren't 2 or 3 or 4 or 6. Why are you so desperately trying to assert that people conspired to control children's minds CENTURIES ago by making geographical distinctions?
I told you, but you didn't read it. The reasons this matters are lost on you, since you are instinctively defending your beliefs from facts. As this discussion proceeds, it's becoming more clear that is your only purpose in it. Since that confirms my theory by revealing the theory correctly predicts future events, I do appreciate it.
You haven't actually addressed the evidence presented in the OP. Your desperation to defend your worldview has resulted in your dancing around it, diverting from it, and apparently setting out to ignore the facts to the extent possible. I suspect it's because it's so simple,provable, and accepting it's factuality would leave you unable to rationally justify your continued support for your overlords that you do this.
This is your angel to wrestle. I am not the origin of these facts. Argue those facts, or don't, as you will. Not addressing them doesn't affect them at all. It just leaves you where you are, and reveals that's where you want to be.
How cute, you predicted someone questioning your theory and that only reinforced your theory, and you appreciate that reinforcement of YOUR theory.
Ego Much? If you had any unbiased bone in you, you'd go back and recognize what a giant ass you've made of yourself by assuming not only what Continents are defined as (strict geographic criteria) but by the numerous assumptions and "indicators" you almost expected (muh bias?) from me, and all the while, you've spared no chance to be a hypocrite by accusing me of both not questioning and of whatevering, of ad hominems and avoidance. Keep bloviating about how I support the overlords, and more power to that overlord hate group you're trying so hard to gather, and keep psychoanalyzing me, I know you don't care, but you do appreciate that I am confirming your predictions.
It is not disagreement that I predicted, but the very form of disagreement you have modeled perfectly. You have too powerfully expressed the acceptance of propaganda to even read and grasp the OP. Indeed, you didn't even read all of it LOL.
I did not define continents singularly and alone. Many people that noted this indoctrination in their youth have pointed out the inconsistency in that inclusion of Europe as a continent. I have pointed out multiple times that no matter how you define a continent, Europe is not one.
That fact, not the minutae of this or that definition, is relevant. You.Can't.Address.That.Fact.At.All.
Why?