RE: Immediately I Start to follow @whack.science example after He is flagged for Self-Voting, Voting for Same People & Writing Same Content All the Time & & after He shows His example of No Self-Voting, No Voting for Same people, No Same people Voting for Him
Since we talk about stats. You really talk like small whale.
Vlemon gave good answer to you and your lobby
Here it Is:
“No votes are going to broncnutz and cryptopassion anymore so you can cross this out. I like jrcornel posts so yes I upvote. Then you have my self votes which I think is still okay isn’t it ?
So you have 25% left on 3 people and the rest on other people. 75% of my upvotes away not through autovotes (taking away my own posts) is still not enough?
75% of your upvotes go to 15 people ! What about your split ? And you get Steem from being a witness so you don’t need to upvote yourself.
Do you think it is fair to give 75% of your upvotes and witness rewards to 15 people most of which are your friends or projects such as @curangel ?
“
Why don't you link to it, so people can read my answer directly where the question was asked?
Let me help you with that:
https://steemit.com/dblog/@vlemon/re-pharesim-2019113t131150551z#@pharesim/q0echb
And I will upvote this comment. Dealing with idiots like you needs to be paid.
Because you've shown that you give downwards to anyone who disagrees with you, you and your lobby group are doing a lot worse things than tatjanastan