You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Attentat! The sword of good, and evil.
Insurrectionary anarchists do not seek to install themselves in positions of power by perpetrating acts of violence, and domination.
that would indeed somewhat negate the whole concept of anarchy itself and come down to sowing dissent in order to position oneself "under the guise of" ...
I think ultimately anarchy is not the lack of government but the lack of need to be governed - like kevin spacey on k-pax lol
it requires a bit of self-discipline to rise above the primal and i fear humanity is far from there
i could quote one of my favourite childhood authors like forever on the subject :
“How does one hate a country, or love one? Tibe talks about it; I lack the trick of it. I know people, I know towns, farms, hills and rivers and rocks, I know how the sun at sunset in autumn falls on the side of a certain plowland in the hills; but what is the sense of giving a boundary to all that, of giving it a name and ceasing to love where the name ceases to apply? What is love of one's country; is it hate of one's uncountry? Then it's not a good thing. Is it simply self-love? That's a good thing, but one mustn't make a virtue of it, or a profession... Insofar as I love life, I love the hills of the Domain of Estre, but that sort of love does not have a boundary-line of hate. And beyond that, I am ignorant, I hope.”― Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness
So many of the masses operate on beliefs that it defies imagination.
They require no proof, just belief.
Until we can manage our own affairs cooperatively, we haven't matured as a real society.
False societies generally follow this pattern.
We are pretty far down that road, and gaining speed.
wrong account lol, i really wish the new Sun-regime would instate a cooldown on posts before they get locked into the chain and make stuff deletable for a window of time (ofcourse unable to vote on until it is ... but well ... i dont do politics and certainly not here)