My very disrespectful response to "The Economist's" biased vaccine-pushing article.

Let's start way back... "Economics" was not even a "real science" (and still isn't, btw...) until the international banksters created it. It has always been a vehicle used to obfuscate their actions and to manipulate public opinion with regard to their machinations in the major economies of the western world. They do all this, of course, with their central banks and their bogus debt-backed fiat currency. "The Economist" magazine is widely viewed as a chief organ of these same forces, and is widely viewed by the alterverse, especially on line, as an "Illuminati" front.

All one need to do is look at their January cover for the past few years to see why a lot of people think there is something more-than-just-a-little bit off about this magazine, and the people behind it. The strange-obscure images (and their possible hidden meanings) on their cover, have sparked a cottage industry off blogsphere mania, all on their own.

But, nonetheless, this is a magazine that is very popular with the elite, and has become the "E.F. Hutton" of economic "wisdom," and even geopolitics. So, when these guys print something, we'd all better at least pay attention.

Here is the link to their recent article declaring that vaccine choice (or lack thereof) "will be a major political battleground in the coming decades." :

https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/01/19/the-campaign-against-vaccination

The article starts by giving us the story of a concerned Italian mom who initially balked when her region of Italy made vaccination compulsory for children to attend the local public schools, and how her long set of conversations with a doctor (aka Big Pharma drug salesman) eventually resulted in her child getting all jabbed up. The article starts in Italy, of course, because that European nation is currently "ground zero" in the resistance to mandatory vaccination. This is so much so that they recently had a third-pary-- "The 5-Star Movement"-- place several members in their national legislature, and got a Health Minister appointed who replaced much of the impetus for mandatory vaccination across the nation with populist "choice" options.

(The Georgia Guidestones. Image courtesy of wdun.com)

This really scares the vaxxers and their well-healed investors. After all, if one nation can do it, so can others. Austria and other European nations are (thankfully) showing strong anti-mandatory-vax movements as well, and the article bemoans the fact that vaccination rates across the continent have been falling.

Now, my response to "The Economist"--as I am not a doctor--will admittedly be based primarily on philosophical and religions arguments. Let's start by just saying, point blank, if "The Economist" is strongly pushing something, especially something around which there is a great deal of doubt regarding efficacy and safety, then, as a human with a soul and a conscience, your best bet is always to take the opposing view. Why? Go back and read the first two paragraphs and go take a close look at those magazine covers. If it reminds you of the Denver Airport murals, that should be a good start.

Next, the elite who love and support "The Economist" tend to all be globalists and centralizers, as well as ardent Mathusians. (Thomas Malthus was an 18th-century philosopher and humanist who insisted that we had to stop the "explosive growth" of the world's population, or everyone would soon starve to death.) Malthusians DOMINATE the United Nations, especially the "Global war...uh.......Climate-Change" crowd who echo Malthus all the time with their doom & gloom predictions that the world will end if we don't put an immediate stop to industrial activity and carbon-based activities. (So much so that one of their new lil' darlins'...freshman U.S. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez... came out this morning saying the world is going to end in 12 years.)

(Thomas Malthus, courtesy of brittanica.com.)

They even got the World Health Organization recently to declare that the burgeoning anti-vax movement is going to be one of the world's gravest health risks for 2019. That is important because, of course, the WHO is essentially a U.N. adjunct and takes their marching orders from the same Malthusians who dominate the U.N., especially as they presume, now, to be the ultimate "health authority" for the planet.

Then, of course, these same Malthusians are on record calling not only for a slowdown in human population increases, but also, for huge "culling" (up to 95%) of the world population as the only solution to "saving the planet" (which they worship as the "goddess Gaia.") Then, it is well known in the alterverse, and may soon be proven beyond there, that elites have been deeply involved in creating designer diseases that have the ability to kill billions of people. So, to summarize...if you have a person in front of you with a loaded weapon telling you the only way the world can continue is if you're gone, how much are you going to trust that individual not to pull the trigger? Add to that the FACT that many of the wealthiest and most powerful are also SATAN WORSHIPERS, and that the Devil is the king of death, and...

Yea, "The Economist," I'll take my chances with contracting the measles or the whooping cough, myself. You go ahead and inject YOURSELF and YOUR CHILDREN with your deadly cocktails, if you like.

No?...not doing that?

Hmmm........

Here is an excerpt from the article that shows the vaxxer's desperation is hanging out (and that populism and the people ARE truly winning--at least in Europe:)

"Across Europe, the rise of populism is damaging public health. A common feature is scepticism (sic) of vaccines. Immunisation (sic) rates are declining and the diseases they are designed to stop are on the rise. Measles cases are at a 20-year high. In Italy, which used to be a model of good vaccination practice, take-up has fallen since 2005 to a level lower than that of Ghana. Between 2016 and 2017 the number of measles cases rose sixfold, to around 5,000. France, Serbia and Greece have also seen notable spikes, but the trend applies across almost the entire continent."

(Yea, they can't spell either...)

Hurray!

Should we start a "5-Star Party" here in the USA?"

Those who argue for mandatory vaccination are actually, wittingly or not, lining up the people of the world to be totally at the mercy of governments and their incestuous bedfellows in Big Pharma. Even if today's vaccines are perfectly safe and effective (an ENORMOUS "if" that I am willing to grant for the moment) what is to say that every "health product" that a profit-hungry vaccination industry may ever produce in the future will be?

NOTHING, I TELL YOU!

Sufficient testing by government agents theoretically charged with the responsibility of protecting the people from iffy concoctions is NOT happening, and is never likely to happen, as long as the politicians that are elected take HUGE campaign contributions from the manufacturers of these "products."

It's plain common sense, people. Very few people will bite the hand that feeds them, even if that hand is potentially toxic. AND...it is...It is both toxic and blood-stained, and it wants to have the blood of billions dripping from it, BY THEIR OWN ADMISSIONS AND PUBLIC STATEMENTS.

I rest my case.