You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
The sun is undoubtedly the biggest factor affecting climate. Yet nobody talks about the sun spots or its cycles because they know it'll mess up their narrative.
Things known for more than a century: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milutin_Milankovi%C4%87
Milutin Milanković
Milutin Milanković (Serbian Cyrillic: Милутин Миланковић [milǔtin milǎːnkɔʋitɕ]; 28 May 1879 – 12 December 1958) was a Serbian mathematician, astronomer, climatologist, geophysicist, civil engineer and popularizer of science.
Milanković gave two fundamental contributions to global science. The first contribution is the "Canon of the Earth’s Insolation", which characterizes the climates of all the planets of the Solar system. The second contribution is the explanation of Earth's long-term climate changes caused by changes in the position of the Earth in comparison to the Sun, now known as Milankovitch cycles.
I agree with Milankovic except that he assumes the sun is static. The sun is far from static. The sun goes through cycles like it is breathing. We are entering a long solar minimum, like the end of an exhale. The next solar maximum will be in 2024. Sunspot activity is increasing. The Schumann Resonance is doubling and tripling intermittently with increasing frequency.
I am 50 years old. When I was young the sun was yellow, now it is white and I burn faster.
I included some links for further review.
https://blogs.nasa.gov/sunspot/author/mshatfie/
https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2019/04/10/experts-predict-the-solar-cycle/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances
http://www.metatech.org/wp/spiritual-warfare/schumann-resonance/
Schumann resonances
The Schumann resonances (SR) are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency (ELF) portion of the Earth's electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, generated and excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere.
Drakos the problem is you conflate headlines and single predictions, as opposed to hard science.
We have had many-many indicators and there has been extreme proof of what is going on.
And then you show red herrings of atrocities which are important that we need to handle as well.
But, as it turns out had we been handling climate change the atroities you listed would not be as extreme and in some cases not exist at all.
Food security is less possible because of the disappearance of arrid land (either from lack of water or flooding),
Dependence and support of Aggressive Regimes occurs because they have fossil fuels.
Pollution of the environment with waste products in many events happens because a lack of alternatives.
The problem is in large complex systems you can either spend much more time and energy , to handle all the problems if you do not deal with exacerbating causes.
I am not going to go into a long issue by issue debate. But even small change against status quo, takes extreme actions and vocaling by minorities.