Two of my recent posts related to heart and brain respectively were flagged for plagiarism. Here's why I think @steemcleaners assessment was in error.

Heart and brain are keywords that bring up billions of pages on the web. The likelihood of finding matches to any cherry-picked phrases, partial sentences or even sentences related to such an omnipresent topic is extremely high, giving rise to the copy-paste conundrum. But is that enough for proving plagiarism?

To counter the plagiarism allegations, I searched for the top plagiarism detecting algorithms available on the Internet and picked up two of the highest ranked sites to test both the posts for plagiarism. They are https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker and https://www.duplichecker.com

Used both of these highly credible sites to test both of my blog posts that were subject of accusers' allegations. Instead of submitting the screenshots of the results, I recorded the live screen activity so you can see the entire process while the content is actually processed by the plagiarism algorithms of these sites. Here is the video evidence:

The results speak for themselves. None of these algorithms detected any plagiarism in any of those articles. You have links of these sites and can also check it yourself. If you want to find out what percent of content similarity is acceptable by peer reviewed journals here's the answer.

Hope this is enough evidence to prove that plagiarism allegation against me is not valid. As such, I request you to please remove your downvotes, and I request you to upvote to compensate the other prejudicial downvotes to these posts and two of my other posts that resulted because of your subjective judgment.

The issue also raises another important question: Would you use your subjective judgment when very efficient algorithms are available to check plagiarism objectively and instantly?

Thanks