RE: Talk Channel: "Comment or ask a question"/ Comente o pregunte (week 277) in the WOX
Delegations can give us greater voting power, and therefore, greater curation rewards. It's important to know the delegation amounts for each post; with 10K SP, you could generate around 25 Steem weekly.
Yeah, I didn’t say the opposite , I think it’s really good to support new active users. I also received support like that not too long ago. But still, it’s not a solution to the main problem: people withdrawing money without a building.
I had a conversation with someone who told me how Steemit used to work — I’m not sure if you were around back then , but there were strict rules for users who only withdrew funds without helping building.
There are also the Club rules, but I don’t think they apply anymore. Like I said, I’m analyzing user behavior and I’ll be sharing a report on building up vs withdrawing. The numbers aren’t looking good at all...
for the ather
Yeah, each person has their own way they can contribute, depending on their role. I think the most important roles are development and marketing—like what you do. I also hope that the people helping to promote the platform get some rewards, because it's not an easy task like many might think.
TThank you as well for your effort. I always get new updates from posts like yours and @pennsif’s. However, I think he hasn't done The Steem News in quite some time
https://steemit.com/steem/@pennsif/the-steem-news-10-february-2025-atlas-ambassadors
I hope it becomes easier to get news on Steemit, like what @disconnect is doing with contests and news posts. For example, if I hadn't come across your post, I would never have heard about Spud4Steem—only randomly. But if there were posts that collect all the latest news and events in one place, it would be much easier to stay updated.
What do you think about that?
This is completely false; in fact, I'm sure there's more of a growth culture these days than before. What I can say is that, in Steemit before the fork, support was governed primarily by delegations. To receive votes, you had to delegate to whale users to qualify for good votes; otherwise, it was a blessing to receive them. Today, there are whales, communities, and users who provide support in a community-based way for nothing.
Club rules were relaxed at the urging of some users, with the intention of further expanding the reach of support and encouraging them to share content more regularly. It remains to be seen whether the results have met expectations.
I think my friend @pennsif is very busy developing Steem Atlas. If he doesn't post updates this week, I think I'll do it myself so I can keep everyone updated until he has time.
It's important to let you know that after the fork, there were only a few developers left, which caused Steem to stagnate. However, since last year, I've seen a lot of movement, and we need to educate communities to support ongoing projects, as I can tell many users don't know how to do so.
I was talking about the problems of over rewards and making withdrawals, not about delegations. I don't know exactly how things were on Steem before I started, but from what I’ve heard, it used to be more organized. For example, if someone only made withdrawals, they wouldn’t receive rewards and might even get downvoted by stakeholders. But I’m not sure—that’s just what I’ve read and what others have told me.
Anyway, I recently analyzed data from over 900,000 user accounts, and here’s what I found:
there bad numbers
I will share all the reports soon, after finishing the analysis of the other accounts.
Yes, as I was saying, since 2021, several dynamics have been developed to encourage power ups. The most effective was the club approach. If you had 100 Steem, the following was applied: club5050 (you activate 50 Steem and withdraw 50 for a month); club75 (you activate 75 Steem and withdraw 25 during the last 2 months); club100 (you activate everything for the last 3 months). This was made more flexible by some user proposals, in order to avoid the exclusion of authors who don't normally power up. During this period, downvotes are not issued for not activating, but accounts are not supported either. Currently, the only way to not receive support is to have active power downs, and yet, there have been cases of support.
Before 2020, there was no culture of growth, as such; just the fact that to receive a vote from a whale, you had to delegate, and to delegate, you obviously had to grow (increase Steem Power), this was the support system before.
Here you can read one of the articles related to this point.
https://steemit.com/metrics/@remlaps-lite/steem-total-value-powered-up-usd29-million-august-27-2023
Thank you for the articles! I didn’t know there were stats like that , because I’m working on something similar .
I think there is a lot of information that new users should know about it. each day i discorve somthing new ..
There are still 1 million accounts to analyze xD
Steemworld has a very useful tool to find out some data related to this.
https://steemworld.org/transfer-search
Wow, you've got your work cut out for you. That's the great thing about being a programmer: they create automated proofreading tools. I'm good at Excel.