Is there is a difference between someone debunking something and proving it to be false?

While most claims cannot be strictly "proven false", sufficient doubt can be cast by "debunking" key elements of the claim.

For example, in the video clip of "the religious vaccine" the brain-scan illustrations are a direct match (stolen) from a completely unrelated source.

Not to mention that "religious thinking" is actually "feudal-hierarchy-thinking" and if we created a vaccine for it, that vaccine would dismantle all authoritarian structures regardless of whether they were "religious" or not.