More detail please. What kind of stuff was deleted?

Nothing outrageous or abusive.

That's encouraging (that it was not abusive) and disappointing (that it was removed) at the same time.

Explanation of why he was voting the Sun Witnesses.

That sounds like the very definition of "reasonable".

The kind of thing that I resonate with, and I imagine that you would agree with at least in part.

Sure, people SHOULDN'T BE BRIBED OR BULLIED INTO VOTING FOR OR AGAINST ANY PARTICULAR ACCOUNT.

Even the steem-oligarchs say they believe this (at least until there's a "crisis").

We should consider civil debate the highest arbiter of conviction.