Not tedious, extremely effective at creating desire for more.
I liked it, thought it was funny.
Certainly not tldw.
To address your questions, rigorous rules of evidence are for prosecutors trying to prove want they don't know is true, is true.
A precarious profession.
I'm more of a stream of consciousness type.
Wishy washy, as it were.
If you describe yourself as "sometimes this and sometimes that" or "wishy-washy" or "undetermined" or "a moral contortionist", I would normally equate any of those terms with "unprincipled". I'm just asking if you would personally agree to that specific terminology or if you prefer something slightly more precise, like perhaps "non-principled".
Or perhaps you consider your lack of identifiable principles to be its own (meritorious) principle?
Or, or, maaaybe you're anti-principle?
Do you believe that all principles are evil and that all people who follow principles are somehow fundamentally suspect?
Do your rules and principles only apply to interactions with your "friends"?
Do you have Uniform Standards Of Evidence (USOE) to rigorously define your "enemies"?
Click to watch 4 minutes,
Damn, many more of those and it will be comic cat videos, all day!
Each person is an individual, point to one without flaw?
Bring one that doesn't change with new data, too.
Do your rules and principles only apply to interactions with your "friends"?
Do you have Uniform Standards Of Evidence (USOE) to rigorously define your "enemies"?
If you find my video illustrations tedious, simply ignore them.
Not tedious, extremely effective at creating desire for more.
I liked it, thought it was funny.
Certainly not tldw.
To address your questions, rigorous rules of evidence are for prosecutors trying to prove want they don't know is true, is true.
A precarious profession.
I'm more of a stream of consciousness type.
Wishy washy, as it were.
Is that OK?
Of course, you are the most perfect @freebornangel (version 2020/03/18) the world has ever, or will ever see!
Would you describe yourself as "unprincipled"?
Is this a job interview, or just an introspective for the back pages.
I'm just trying to figure out what you believe.
If you describe yourself as "sometimes this and sometimes that" or "wishy-washy" or "undetermined" or "a moral contortionist", I would normally equate any of those terms with "unprincipled". I'm just asking if you would personally agree to that specific terminology or if you prefer something slightly more precise, like perhaps "non-principled".
Or perhaps you consider your lack of identifiable principles to be its own (meritorious) principle?
Or, or, maaaybe you're anti-principle?
Do you believe that all principles are evil and that all people who follow principles are somehow fundamentally suspect?
😒 Oh, OK.
In that case, I would say that predicting the future is quite hard to do, as people change, sometimes.
So, yes, quite unprincipled, in that new data has tended to change long cherished beliefs, but not so much in an unbridled meaning.
Principles have their place.
Dissent is important to finding 'the truth'.
Who is to say?
Tag @penderis