You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Discussion: Did you receive an upvote from a witness?
Complex questions. It is difficult to answer them objectively. In my opinion, the evaluation of posts should not depend on the SP in the wallet. Otherwise, there will be no influx of newcomers. The resource must develop, fill with more and more new users.
Hi, @galca,
Thank you for your contribution. Your post has been manually curated.
- Delegate to @ecosynthesizer and vote @symbionts as a witness to support us.
- Explore Steem using our Steem Blockchain Explorer
- Easily create accounts on Steem using JoinSteem
0.00 SBD,
0.10 STEEM,
0.10 SP
Thank you for your answer. I l like to show you the answer a witness gave me as I made a remark about the 0.01% upvote I received, which, of course, is 0. Now I am one of those people who say "thank you" and in many cases automatically give an upvote back. My upvote is never 0.
From his response, I understand he upvotes everyone who voted for him, so he never reads who posts what? If this is the case it's not difficult to understand not everyone can receive a valuable upvote if this is done daily.
Should a witness upvote everyone who votes for him? Or can a witness rotate, vote for good posts, what he likes?
Underneath the answer from jswit
joviansummer (76)
in ᔕᑕᗷ ᗰOᑎKEY ᗷᑌᔕIᑎEᔕᔕ • 15 hours ago
A portion of @jswit's SP is delegated to @jsup service to support delegators who delegated SP to @jsup. The remaining SP is used to give automated upvotes to witness voters and vote weight is proportional to account's own SP. It's automatically calculated according to daily amount of voting power consumption.
SP for upvote has been always increasing because I never power-down @jswit, but the rate of increase is not so good due to low witness rank.
I'm not sure what kind of expectation you have but it seems I can't provide you that. But I don't think that gives you a right to insult me. If you want to insult me, at least provide enough justification. If you think you deserve bigger upvote from @jswit, provide good reasons why I have to override the current vote weight calculation algorithm and give you some kind of special privilege than others.
https://steemit.com/okey-ie/@joviansummer/sxiswk
0.00 SBD,
0.00 STEEM,
0.02 SP
Steemit users vote for delegates.
Some delegates vote for posts of those who voted for them in gratitude. Logically, they should vote proportionally. Those who have more savings in their wallets get a higher percentage of votes. But at the same time, they have no such obligation. This is everyone's free choice.
0.00 SBD,
0.09 STEEM,
0.09 SP
I agree with you that it is a free choice. Any idea what will happen if the most votes and the highest only go to those with a high SP regardless of what they post?
Thank you for taking part in the discussion.