You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: ᔕᑕᗷ: New Source - GentBG (Gentlemen's Burning Gallery) - Men Only
Me encantaría escuchar argumentos sólidos sobre estartegias para fortalecer el steem en el mercado. Comparto contigo que lo de quemar steem, quizás benefició a alguien, pero no a la mayoría de los usuarios, y mucho menos a la criptomoneda.
If there is fewer Steem the value goes up. Does tgis mean that you lost your fortune if you burn 50% of it? The answer is no since what is worth 0.13 cents now can be 1$ meaning you still have a big win.
Are there people wjo could make a difference willing to burn? Only if the big group does. Who knows the SC teams are the first who should since they are the company and companies should set the strategy.
All SC teams can burn 50% to start with. They earn anyway if they upvote posts and always upvote.
I also believe that Steemit should be more visible since the exchanges forget about Steem. Those I spoke state there is no development which makes Steem/SBD not interesting.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
How to realise your idea, who can do that?
♥️🍀
Sí, hace falta más difusión. Particularmente, apoyo los meet-up. Pero con otro enfoque. Por ejemplo, casda asistente al Meet-up debería llevar a cinco personas para unirse a la plataforma como campaña de promoción. En verdad, no le veo el sentido a gastar tanto dinero para reunirse medio día sin que eso no repercuta en un crecimiento para Steemit.
And where exactly should the money come from to give rewards? Will all those new Steemians buy Steem and start upvoting?
We already face the fact that most rewards go to a select group and there are many who feel very disappointed because it's hard for them to grow.
Out of those who do upvote most will go for the ones they know will receive high upvotes because they can earn by voting for them and not a newcomer.
You know just like me that no one likes to share. More Steemians will not pump the value of Steem and that's what is needed.