You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: ᔕᑕᗷ Witness - Thank You!

Hi Kitty, I can't tell you anything about the functionality of apps, I generally don't use them... As far as withdrawing delegations is concerned, it always and everywhetre takes five days to become available. The wallet options haven't changed in this respect either... The same applies to SBD savings. Was always possible. Remain SBD accordingly. Setting percentages for votes - no problem. No idea what trick the technology is playing on you. Some script that you have disabled...?

I would like to discreetly disagree with your call for thanks and counter-votes. If I give you a vote, you deserve it in my eyes. With a good text, with a good deed, or simply as a nice person ;-)) No need to thank me. And no reason to give me a vote in return. Because maybe I don't write so well, don't act so altruistically or am simply not nice ;-)) No votes out of a perceived obligation! This in turn fuels the expectation that every account that gives you an inflationary 0 ct worth of 100% votes will get the same (i.e. 100% votes) back from you. I think that's fundamentally wrong.

Greetings - @weisser-rabe

Sort:  
 2 months ago 

I am sure there has never been a savings for the SBD, and this issue is also mentioned as the many accounts were robbed. So, if you saw it, the question is: how come many didn't and still don't, and had to leave it where it was (not in savings), where it could be easily transferred? Not once @jiva34 received an answer. No one responded as we asked how SBD is, unlike Steem not protected, although the value is higher.

Can it be the browser? Is it due to the differences in apps?

I still see a huge difference if it comes to the layout and options of steemit.com (Samsung - Firefox - Adware) some options are not visible. And no, I don't like to use Chrome of being forced to do so. I can't see a part of the menu.

If it comes to saying thank you and showing some gratitude, I disagree. Upvotes are taken for granted, and there is a large group that refuses to give an upvote (also noticed during we-write).No explanation given either what makes them believe they have the right to demand upvotes while never voting for anyone (hard to believe there's not one single post or comment one likes, this besides of the fact we all have our favourite writers we reward or?). What makes this different from the farmer accounts?

I do agree that not everyone should receive if you don't like what is written, although I do upvote text I don't agree with simply because it can still be good. I don't vote for those who give me 0 out of 0 simply because I don't use steemchiller to check who votes how much. As I understand it's fine not to thank SCs and not take part in the PoB the platform is based on.

Thanks for the response and sharing your experiences. Plenty of food for the mind.

The different representations are a problem, yes. Perhaps this has been harmonised in recent weeks and months? It's hard for me to judge, as I never work with smartphone apps. I use three different browsers on my PC for my private and Community accounts; a fourth in the months when I was sc. I know the wallet in all these browsers - and a few others that I discarded over time for various reasons - in its current form and functionality. The only difference: TRX used to be distributed and reported.

Btw - I don't use Google services either. I can recommend Brave, Libre Wolf or Ecosia as a full browser or Arora as a mini browser with a reduced range of functions, but sufficient for all Steemit matters...