Sort:  

If you promote the platform as the place where you can earn cryptocurrencies, writing any content of poor quality (or farmeando) can enter many users and then leave. I think one of the big failures is that there is no respect for quality work. It can be promoted as an art platform. For artists. (How many artists are there in the world, with interest in promoting their work. Why do I see so few on steemit. More farmers than writers and painters). Many successful sites where you even pay membership. And they are by writers, to cite one example. But more value is placed on the art, the writing, what they do. The quality of the content. What do you think happens when an artist comes in and sees the mess of what is commonly voted on. Demotivation, the real artists are almost all sensitive. They get very frustrated. How many thousands of accounts are abandoned?
And the best thing I've seen is what you do, promote dialogue. Vote for comments of value. They should, always, follow your lead. Contests. Interest. Criticism. Dialogue.
And answer in a clear way the doubts of the communities. I know very successful platforms, which despised the user and today are wandering ghosts.
PS: Clear about what the platform is about. Art. Farming. Social networking. Casino.

I have no idea what the platform syands for. I ask it since years what to promote. I've been asked as a writer, but many who arrived during/after the hardfork spread/heard a different story (dropna few words or picture and you get paid. No one said it had to be original, mentioned plagiarism, AI, and so on.)

If it comes to it it's for investors. The rest is to make it a bit more interesting. It could be more, way more but not if no one cares or wants ro invest in a platform and the future and everyone relies on a few to act and fill all the wallets. Why should those few do that?

♥️🍀