Yes 👍 or No 👎???
Thoughts? Useful information or a waste of space?
I'm thinking that votes by one of the Steemit accounts (SC01-09/booming01-03) might signal to the curator that the post passed some sort of minimal quality standard, and this might be an author to follow for a shot at future curation rewards.
It might also give some extra visibility to Steemit's contributions in the ecosystem.
Finally, it might make it easier for the community to help provide quality control.
What do you think?
👍 / 👎 ?
👍
From the point of view of a member of the curation teams, such information is very useful and can save a lot of time. As you know, SC03-09 accounts cannot support posts that are already supported by Steemit team resources. Thus, after receiving information that the post has already been supported by Steemit, the curator may not even open it and continue his search.
If we talk about the future, where we want to move away from the decisive influence of the Steemit team and create a strong decentralized community, I don't see anything wrong with such information either. This is just information, it is neither negative nor positive. Each member of the community decides for himself what to do with the received information. As a community that wants to become independent, we first need to accumulate resources, but not be afraid of unnecessary mention of the Steemit team (and this was said by a person who just did a Power Down and sold 10 thousand STEEM 😆).
Exactly. People are free to use or ignore any information in their own curation decisions. I also don't see a downside, unless it's crowding out some other piece of information that would be more useful.
Your point from the perspective of the curation team members is something that I hadn't even considered.
Not sure, from just a "raw data" perspective, but if done through the lens of vetting the actual teams using SC03-09, it might be useful.... but that sort of defeats the purpose of having it, and it's no longer simple.
That said, with a potential altcoin bull run simmering in the early stages, having some kind of quality control cross reference will be a useful tool, as the "horde" is sure to show up if Steem gets back to $0.50-$1.00 or more.
Edited to add: I'd rather see something like a ratio of upvotes to actual page views as a measure of how many people actually READ a given piece of content.
👍 der Gedanke gefällt mir auch !
VgA
Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any way to get page views - especially given the possibility for views through multiple front-ends. Your suggestion made me think that I could get payout per feed placement, though (based upon the "feed-reach" number, above). Not as good a payout per view, but maybe a step in the right direction. I might add that metric. Thanks for the feedback!
Von mir auch ein Nein
Frage : Wer ist SC01-XY
Ich weis schon das es ein Konto mit viel SP. ist aber weis nichts über die User nur weil einer viel SP hat ist er nicht der Entscheidet was gut oder weniger gut ist , das liegt immer im Auge des Betrachters,
Was ich gut finde das Du dir Gedanken 💭 darüber machst 👍❗️
VgA
Thanks for the feedback! I agree that individual curators should make their own decisions, and obviously, no one will agree with every vote from the Steemit curators and curation teams. But, do you think there's a downside to presenting this information, or is it just that it wouldn't be useful to you?
Das wird weder ein Vorteil noch ein Nachteil sein , ich versuche es mal anders zu sagen , der Steem ist sehr Steecurator geprägt, es braucht nicht noch mehr Steemcurator .
VgA
👎from me :)