You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Kommentar, der etwas länger geworden ist...

I read that emotion stirring post shortly after atego published it. I wanted to write something there but since the time I have been handling the little sc, I'm happy that I get to read more but on the downside there's never enough time for engagement. I didn't want to leave a hasty and hollow comment. But now that you have mentioned me, I feel obliged to write a response.

You have already mentioned why explicit details of the curator is important in the sc comments. Although it opens a can of new problems - increase in unwanted (selfish) followers, forced traffic on personal blogs and a vibrant Discord. But that's how it is, you can't have everything according to your wish.

Regarding the matter of "thankyou and not a personalized comment"...

There's not enough time to reply with a personalized and content relevant comment on 20+ posts in a day. I will be honest, I can read a lot in a day but I can't make more than 5 meaningful comments because I have a life beside steem. It doesn't involve sheep though but yes there's a life.

I am wondering as I write... there are hardly any people who thank "tipu" for voting under his spam comment. Probably because his vote to non-delegators is worth only a few cents. Money matters...atego is right. 🤔

Sort:  

atego is right. 🤔

🤗 🤗🤗

There's not enough time to reply with a personalized and content relevant comment on 20+ posts in a day. I will be honest, I can read a lot in a day but I can't make more than 5 meaningful comments because I have a life beside steem. It doesn't involve sheep though but yes there's a life

Ok, verständlich , der Standart Kommentar ist aber auch keine Lösung, warum überhaupt kommentieren jeder sieht das der Sc. da war und SC01 weis auch welcher Sc Kurator gevotet hat oder haben verschiedene Kuratoren zur gleichen Zeit die Möglichkeit zu Voten !?

VgA

SC01 also knows which Sc curator voted

He wouldn't know unless the sc curators follow a strict schedule (recorded at the blockchain) and only the person responsible for the day would be answerable for all activity (all curators don't vote at once).

However, some people don't like disclosing their curation schedule because of the beggars.

Anyway, the schedule can be shared privately with the off-chain spokesperson of sc01 to maintain transparency or there have to be other ways to do this... a comment is not necessary perhaps...🤔

!finanzbot 20%

Loading...

Saw you...
Please let me sleep until tomorrow.
And happy belated birthday! Gosh, 32, you could be my daughter and I'm ashamed not to be able to reply to you directly in your post at the moment. Too old, too tired... 😂... 😴

32 is not that young. 😀

Too old, too tired... 😂... 😴

Take rest.😅