You may also want to consider a "market for lemons" type of analysis. If market participants have a hard time distinguishing the quality of goods on an item-by-item basis then provenance can become more important.
You may also want to consider a "market for lemons" type of analysis. If market participants have a hard time distinguishing the quality of goods on an item-by-item basis then provenance can become more important.
Interesting. There's a big information asymmetry between "author" and reader w.r.t. whether or not the article is written by AI. In the context of science & law, there's less asymmetry w.r.t whether the information is truthful - since the claims are verifiable with some effort. When it comes to general writing quality, there's not much asymmetry at all, since the reader can tell easily if the writing sucks or not.
But yeah, it seems like the "brand" of the creator becomes more important. I guess this isn't very surprising since the strength of an account's follower networks is one of the focus areas that I have been exploring. Steem's reputation score isn't very useful (except in predicting votes), but I think the follower network strength metrics can be a decent predictor of quality.
0.00 SBD,
0.12 STEEM,
0.12 SP